Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, M. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, M. A
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 1, 69-73
© Oxford University Press 2003

Clinical Research

Understanding variation in quality improvement: the treatment of sore throats in primary care

Tom Marshall and Mohammed A Mohammed

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Correspondence to T Marshall; E-mail: T.P.Marshall{at}bham.ac.uk

Background. In 1988, two practices attempted to improve the prescribing of antibiotics for sore throat. The initiative produced only modest improvements in prescribing practice, a finding the authors found difficult to explain. This paper reanalyses the data from an audit of antibiotic prescribing for sore throat in general practice.

Objective. Our aim was to demonstrate the use of Shewhart control charts and to obtain fresh insight into the variations in clinical practice revealed in clinical audit data.

Methods. We use Shewhart control charts to explore variation in antibiotic prescribing between GPs and to suggest the action most likely to result in improvement.

Results. Using control charts, it is possible to distinguish two categories of GPs: low prescribers of antibiotics and high prescribers of antibiotics. Low prescribers of antibiotics show common cause variation, indicating that their prescribing is a stable process. Among low prescribers, improvement can best be achieved by changing the common underlying process. One high prescriber of antibiotics is affected by special cause variation. Among high prescribers, improvement can best be achieved by investigating the special causes affecting this GP and learning lessons from the findings.

Conclusion. The original improvement effort took the same action on all GPs in both practices. Our analysis suggests that such an approach was unlikely to be successful and that different actions were needed for high and low prescribers. The control charts provide fresh insights on the original data and guide improvement efforts.

Keywords. Antibiotics, clinical audit, general practice, quality improvement, sore throat.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J. Thor, J. Lundberg, J. Ask, J. Olsson, C. Carli, K. P. Harenstam, and M. Brommels
Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 387 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.