Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 2, 167-172
© Oxford University Press 2003
Health Services Research |
GPs working in solo practice: obstacles and motivations for working in a group? A qualitative study
Centre Universitaire de Medecine Generale, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 5360, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Correspondence to Dr Feron; E-mail: Jean-Marc. Feron{at}cumg.ucl.ac.be
Objective. Our aim was to analyse the obstacles and eventual motivations of solo GPs for working in group practice.
Methods. A qualitative study using 12 focus groups was carried out in primary care in French-speaking Belgium. The subjects comprised four samples of GPs: 20 GP trainers, 18 GP trainees, 25 women GPs and 25 other GPs. The focus groups were taped and transcribed. Two independent researchers carried out the analysis using the QSR NUD.IST® software.
Results. The participants (88 GPs) did not share a common definition of group practicein particular multidisciplinary workingthe need for a common pool of patients and shared premises. Their main sources of motivation for eventually setting up a group practice were better quality of life, continuity of care and sharing professional knowledge. The main obstacles were a required agreement between colleagues, the loss of a personal patientGP relationship, budgetary constraints, and divergent views on group practice and GPs profession (especially true for the association of GPs from different age groups).
Conclusion. The current study shows that GPs working solo have divergent views of group practice. However, they clearly perceive advantages to this type of association (e.g. better quality of life and continuity of care). This study also confirms the high level of stress and tiredness felt by GPs and especially senior practitioners.
Keywords. Continuity of patient care, family practice, focus groups, group practice, quality of life.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R J Cooper Solo doctors and ethical isolation J. Med. Ethics, November 1, 2009; 35(11): 692 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-D. Beaulieu, V. Dory, D. Pestiaux, D. Pouchain, M. Rioux, G. Rocher, B. Gay, and L. Boucher What does it mean to be a family physician?: Exploratory study with family medicine residents from 3 countries Can Fam Physician, August 1, 2009; 55(8): e14 - e20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Lazarus, L. Jaruseviciene, and J. Liljestrand Lithuanian general practitioners' knowledge of confidentiality laws in adolescent sexual and reproductive healthcare: A cross-sectional study Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2008; 36(3): 303 - 309. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M L van Driel, S Coenen, K Dirven, J Lobbestael, I Janssens, P Van Royen, F M Haaijer-Ruskamp, M De Meyere, J De Maeseneer, and T Christiaens What is the role of quality circles in strategies to optimise antibiotic prescribing? A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 197 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C Dean, C. E Harper, F. P Cappuccio, E. Rink, C. Dirckx, J. Arnout, F. Zito, L. Iacoviello, and on behalf of the European Collaborative Group of t The challenges of cross-national research in primary health care across Europe Fam. Pract., June 1, 2005; 22(3): 341 - 346. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




