Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by George, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by George, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 2, 178-184
© Oxford University Press 2003

Health Services Research

Non-attendance in general practice: a systematic review and its implications for access to primary health care

Ajay George and Greg Rubin

Centre for Primary and Community Care, University of Sunderland, Benedict Building, St George’s Way, Sunderland SR2 7BW, UK.

Correspondence to Ajay George; E-mail: ajay.george{at}sunderland.ac.uk

Background. Non-attendance in general practice has received increasing attention over the past few years. Its relationship with access to health care has been recognized and is of particular relevance in light of the access targets set out in the NHS Plan.

Methods. The literature was searched for articles relating to non-attendance. Titles and abstracts were examined, and relevant articles obtained. Bibliographies were examined for further references. Articles that described interventions for reducing non-attendance that were comparative studies and that examined general appointments, as opposed to appointments for screening purposes for example, were of particular interest.

Results and Conclusions. The epidemiology of non-attendance has been well described, but there is little work on the reasons for non-attendance. Evidence for effective interventions to improve attendance in primary care is lacking, and this may prove to be an area of research interest in the future. As well as specific interventions to reduce non-attendance, new approaches to health care access are required in order to tackle this issue.

Keywords. Appointments and schedules, health services accessibility, primary health care, systematic review.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
L. A. Siminoff, L. R. M. Hausmann, and S. Ibrahim
Barriers to Obtaining Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease Among Veterans
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2008; 98(12): 2207 - 2213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
K Fairhurst and A Sheikh
Texting appointment reminders to repeated non-attenders in primary care: randomised controlled study
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 373 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
A. Zailinawati, C. Ng, and H. Nik-Sherina
Why Do Patients With Chronic Illnesses Fail To Keep Their Appointments? A Telephone Interview
Asia Pac J Public Health, March 1, 2006; 18(1): 10 - 15.
[PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
C. Martin, T. Perfect, and G. Mantle
Non-attendance in primary care: the views of patients and practices on its causes, impact and solutions
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2005; 22(6): 638 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
K. Weinger, S. J. McMurrich, J. P. Yi, S. Lin, and M. Rodriguez
Psychological Characteristics of Frequent Short-Notice Cancellers of Diabetes Medical and Education Appointments
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2005; 28(7): 1791 - 1793.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.