Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hay, E. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hay, E. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 3, 289-293
© Oxford University Press 2003


Screening

Osteoporosis: what are the implications of DEXA scanning ‘high risk’ women in primary care?

Elaine Thomasa, Jane C Richardsona, Alison Irvinea, Andrew B Hassellb and Elaine M Haya,b

a Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, North Staffordshire ST5 5BG
b Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, The Haywood, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, North Staffordshire ST6 7AG, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Elaine Thomas; E-mail: e.thomas{at}keele.ac.uk

Background. Current recommended practice for the use of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans in screening for osteoporosis is to concentrate on women at ‘high risk’.

Objective. We have applied such a screening strategy, in a general practice setting, to estimate the number of women requiring scans.

Methods. A two-phase survey was carried out: (i) postal screen of clinical indicators for low bone mineral density (BMD) to define women at ‘high risk’; and (ii) DEXA scanning of the sample at ‘high risk’ set in two general practices in North Staffordshire. Computerized general practice records were used to define a purposive sample of 1001 women, to receive the screening tool, consisting of three equal size groups (i) those with an early hysterectomy; (ii) those receiving oral corticosteroids on repeat prescription; and (iii) those on the practice cervical smear register. A random sample of women defined at ‘high risk’ by the screening tool were invited to have a DEXA scan. The main outcome of interest was the presence of low BMD as measured by a DEXA scanner.

Results. Sixty-five out of 95 women invited (68%) agreed to undergo a DEXA scan: median age = 52 years (interquartile range 44–64 years). Twenty-nine of these 65 women (45%) were classified with low BMD (WHO criteria): 90% had densities below their age-matched mean. Extrapolating from the observed findings to the main study practice (n = 9000 total population), we estimate that 162 women would be defined at ‘high risk’, and, if all were offered a scan, 105 would comply and 56 would be defined with low BMD.

Conclusions. Using this approach, we estimate the unmet need, in women, for DEXA scans to be 180 per 10 000 total practice population. Allowing for scan uptake, this would define ~60 women per 10 000 total practice population with low BMD. The application of this screening strategy has identified a group of women who might benefit from treatment or prophylaxis for osteoporosis.

Keywords. DEXA scan, high risk, osteoporosis, primary care, women.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. Gattellari, N. Donnelly, N. Taylor, M. Meerkin, G. Hirst, and J. E Ward
Does 'peer coaching' increase GP capacity to promote informed decision making about PSA screening? A cluster randomised trial
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2005; 22(3): 253 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. C Richardson, A. B Hassell, E. Thomas, and E. M Hay
GPs' perceptions of the role of DEXA scanning: an exploratory study
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 51 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.