Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 3, 324-332
© Oxford University Press 2003
Models of Care |
An approach for integrating complementary– alternative medicine into primary care
Complementary and Traditional Medicine Unit, Department of Family Practice, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa,
a Department of Behavioral Sciences, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel and Department of Family Medicine, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
Correspondence to Moshe Frenkel, MD, Hashoftim 1 B, Zichron Yaacov, Israel; E-email: frenkelm{at}netvision.net.il
Background. Despite family practitioners frequently being requested to assist their patients with advice on or referrals to complementary–alternative medicine (CAM), there is an absence both of evidence about the efficacy of nearly all specific treatments or modalities and of guidelines to assist with the integration of conventional and CAM therapies.
Objective. The aim of this article is to suggest a comprehensive and rational, best-evidence strategy for integrating CAM by primary care practitioners into primary care, within the context of the limitations of the current knowledge base and the local milieu.
Methods. The suggested approach was developed by a combination of literature review, key informant interviews, focus groups, educational presentations for family practice residents and practitioners, and field testing. An iterative model was utilized whereby more refined drafts of the suggested approach were subjected to later discussants and groups, as well as further field testing. Drafts of the strategy were utilized in consultations of patients requesting advice on alternative medicine in a primary care setting and in a CAM clinic.
Results. Both family physicians and CAM practitioners provided useful comments and recommendations throughout the process. These can be categorized in terms of knowledge, attitudes and skills. Our strategy suggests that patients requesting advice on the use and integration of CAM modalities as part of their health care should be evaluated initially by their primary care physician. The physician’s responsibilities are to evaluate the appropriateness of that use, and to maintain contact, monitoring outcomes. Advice on referrals should be based on the safety of the method in question, current knowledge on indications and contraindications of that modality, and familiarity and an open dialogue with the specific therapist.
Conclusions. Given patients’ demands and utilization of CAM therapies, despite the lack of evidence, there is an increasing need to address how CAM therapies can be integrated into conventional medical systems. These suggestions should respond to patient’s expectations and needs, but at the same time maintain accepted standards of medical and scientific principles of practice.
Keywords. Alternative medicine, clinical guidelines, complementary medicine, family practice, integrative medicine.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Kennedy, C.-C. Wang, and C.-H. Wu Patient Disclosure about Herb and Supplement Use among Adults in the US Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., May 17, 2007; (2007) nem045v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Bardia, D. L. Barton, L. J. Prokop, B. A. Bauer, and T. J. Moynihan Efficacy of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies in Relieving Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5457 - 5464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Ben-Arye and M. Frenkel An Approach to Teaching Physicians about Complementary Medicine in the Treatment of Cancer Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2004; 3(3): 208 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|