Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janssens, H.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janssens, H.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 4, 413-416
© Oxford University Press 2003


Clinical Research

Gout, just a nasty event or a cardiovascular signal? A study from primary care

HJEM Janssens, EH van de Lisdonk, H Bor, HJM van den Hoogen and M Janssena

University Medical Centre, Department of General Practice and Family Medicine 229, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen
a Department of Rheumatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to EH van de Lisdonk; E-mail: e.vandelisdonk{at}hag.umcn.nl

Objective. Our aim was to examine the relationship between gout on the one hand and cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular risk indicators on the other.

Methods. A case–control study was carried out in an aggregate primary care population of ~12 000 patients from four Dutch general practices, with follow-up of the cases free of cardiovascular diseases at the time of the first registered episode of gout. The subjects comprised 261 patients with a first episode of gout, 170 of whom were without prevalent cardiovascular diseases, and two control patients for each case matched for age, sex and practice. In the case–control study, the main outcome measures were the prevalence of cardiovascular morbidity (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral vascular disease), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity and hypercholesterolaemia; in the follow-up study, the main outcome measure was the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity.

Results. Thirty-five percent of 261 gout patients and 26% of 522 controls had one or more prevalent cardiovascular diseases. Compared with controls, patients had a higher prevalence of hypertension (43% versus 18%), hypercholesterolaemia (14% versus 6%) and obesity (56% versus 30%). A total of 170 gout patients without prevalent cardiovascular diseases (compared with 340 controls) had a higher prevalence of hypertension (39% versus 14%), hypercholesterolaemia (8% versus 4%), diabetes mellitus (5% versus 1%) and obesity (52% versus 27%). The first occurrence of a cardiovascular disease (real end-point) was seen in 26% of the patients free of cardiovascular morbidity and in 21% of the controls. This difference was not significant. In a Cox proportional hazard model, controlling for the cardiovascular risk indicators, gout did not prove to be an independent determinant for the development of cardiovascular disease.

Conclusion. Gout was found to be associated with cardiovascular diseases and with cardiovascular risk indicators, without evidence of it being an independent risk indicator itself. A gout attack should be an incentive to assess the cardiovascular risk profile, when a patient seeks medical help.

Keywords. Cardiovascular diseases, case, control study, gout, primary health care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. E. Willburger, E. Mysler, J. Derbot, T. Jung, H. Thurston, A. Kreiss, S. Litschig, G. Krammer, and G. A. Tate
Lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily is comparable to indomethacin 50 mg three times daily for the treatment of acute flares of gout
Rheumatology, July 1, 2007; 46(7): 1126 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
W Zhang, M Doherty, E Pascual, T Bardin, V Barskova, P Conaghan, J Gerster, J Jacobs, B Leeb, F Liote, et al.
EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: Diagnosis. Report of a task force of the standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutics (ESCISIT)
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2006; 65(10): 1301 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
H J E M Janssens, E H van de Lisdonk, M Janssen, H J M van den Hoogen, and A L M Verbeek
Gout, not induced by diuretics? A case-control study from primary care
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2006; 65(8): 1080 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Underwood
Diagnosis and management of gout.
BMJ, June 3, 2006; 332(7553): 1315 - 1319.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other articles noted: 25 Jul 03 to 7 Nov 03
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2004; 7(1): e1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.