Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenter, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lamberts, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenter, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lamberts, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 4, 434-440
© Oxford University Press 2003


International Health Care Research

Tiredness in Dutch family practice. Data on patients complaining of and/or diagnosed with ‘tiredness’

EGH Kenter, IM Okkesa, SK Oskama and H Lambertsa

Family Physician, Haarlem and
a Department of Family Practice, Division of Clinical Methods and Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dr IM Okkes; E-mail: i.m.okkes{at}amc.uva.nl

Background. Research including patients from the entire tiredness spectrum in family practice is needed.

Objectives. Our aim was to provide routine family practice data on (i) relationships between the RFE (reason for encounter) and the diagnosis ‘tiredness’; (ii) duration, number of encounters and family physician’s (FP’s) interventions in episodes of care of tiredness; and (iii) sex/age and co-morbidity of patients diagnosed with ‘tiredness’.

Methods. Routine episode of care data from the Transition Project, coded comprehensively with the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC), were used. (i) A 16 year database (1985–2000, 58 FPs, 504 145 episodes of care, 168 550 patient years) for calculating ‘prior probabilities’ with (diagnostic) odds ratios. (ii) A ‘basic population’ extracted from that 16 year database of patients listed for an entire 4 year period (1997–2000; n = 12 292).

Results. The RFE tiredness resulted in a variety of diagnoses, but most frequently (43%) in ‘tiredness’. Most odds ratios were low or negative. Of episodes of care of tiredness, 90% started with the RFE tiredness; 72% required one encounter only, and 90% lasted <6 months. In the 4 year period, 21% of patients first presented with tiredness, and 12% were diagnosed with tiredness; both groups were skewed towards women. Average co-morbidity in tired patients (16.6) was higher than in other visiting patients (10.4), and contained more tiredness-related conditions. FPs’ interventions were mainly blood test, physical exam and advice; few referrals occurred.

Conclusions. For many diagnoses, the RFE tiredness hardly contributes to the Bayesian posterior probability. FPs react differently to the RFE tiredness in cases in which they diagnose the patient with ‘tiredness’ from how they react in other cases. The characteristics of ICPC and the Dutch health care system resulted in a full integration of tiredness as an RFE and as a freestanding episode of care in the context of family practice.

Keywords. Episode of care, family practice, probability, reason for encounter, tiredness.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H Koch, M. van Bokhoven, P. Bindels, T van der Weijden, G. Dinant, and G ter Riet
The course of newly presented unexplained complaints in general practice patients: a prospective cohort study
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2009; 26(6): 455 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
I. Nijrolder, D. van der Windt, H. de Vries, and H. van der Horst
Diagnoses during follow-up of patients presenting with fatigue in primary care
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 10, 2009; 181(10): 683 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
M. A. van Bokhoven, H. Koch, T. van der Weijden, R. P. T. M. Grol, A. D. Kester, P. E. L. M. Rinkens, P. J. E. Bindels, and G.-J. Dinant
Influence of Watchful Waiting on Satisfaction and Anxiety Among Patients Seeking Care for Unexplained Complaints
Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2009; 7(2): 112 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
I. Nijrolder, D. A.W.M. van der Windt, and H. E. van der Horst
Prognosis of Fatigue and Functioning in Primary Care: A 1-Year Follow-up Study
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2008; 6(6): 519 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
M. M. Eberl, R. L. Phillips Jr, H. Lamberts, I. Okkes, and M. C. Mahoney
Characterizing Breast Symptoms in Family Practice
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2008; 6(6): 528 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
A. J. Wearden and C. Chew-Graham
Managing chronic fatigue syndrome in UK primary care: challenges and opportunities
Chronic Illness, June 1, 2006; 2(2): 143 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
W. T Hamilton, A. M Gallagher, J. M Thomas, and P. D White
The prognosis of different fatigue diagnostic labels: a longitudinal survey
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2005; 22(4): 383 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
A. M Gallagher, J. M Thomas, W. T Hamilton, and P. D White
Incidence of fatigue symptoms and diagnoses presenting in UK primary care from 1990 to 2001
J R Soc Med, December 1, 2004; 97(12): 571 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
W. Hamilton and D. Sharp
Diagnosis of lung cancer in primary care: a structured review
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2004; 21(6): 605 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.