Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomasik, T
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomasik, T
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 4, 464-468
© Oxford University Press 2003

International Health Care Research

Transient ischaemic attacks: desired diagnosis and management by Polish primary care physicians

T Tomasik, A Windak, G Margas, RA de Melkera and HM Jacobs{dagger}

Department of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Bochenska 4, 31-061 Kraków, Poland and
a Department of Family Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

{dagger} Correspondence to T Tomasik; E-mail: mmtomasi{at}cyf-kr.edu.pl

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the competence of Polish primary care physicians in diagnosing and managing patients with transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) in the carotid territory.

Method. A written questionnaire was distributed to all first-contact physicians (n = 100) in one of the seven health care districts of Warsaw (response rate 89%). The questionnaire included three pairs of TIA cases. In each of the pairs, only the age and type varied. Three cases were characterized by transient monocular blindness and the other three by symptoms of hemispheral ischaemia.

Results. Physicians confronted with TIA cases had difficulties in diagnosing it. In the cases of monocular blindness, only 20–44% of cases were diagnosed correctly, and hemispheral ischaemia was diagnosed correctly in 46–78% of cases. Patients with no history of non-specific symptoms and with the first attack would have a higher percentage of correct diagnoses in comparison with those with recurrent attacks and a history of non-specific symptoms. Patients with hemispheral ischaemia frequently would be referred to neurologists, and about two-thirds of doctors would refer patients with monocular blindness to ophthalmologists, and fewer than half to neurologists. Antiplatelet therapy would be prescribed by <22% of physicians, while peripheral vasodilatators would be prescribed by up to 60% of them.

Conclusion. The results of this study indicate that Polish primary care physicians when confronted with TIA cases would have basic difficulties, especially in diagnosis and management. These results underline the need for changes in the vocational training of primary care physicians, with special attention to frequent family medicine problems.

Keywords. Diagnosis, general practice, management, transient ischaemic attack.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.