Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broom, D. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Broom, D. H
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 5, 503-507
© Oxford University Press 2003

The consultation

Familiarity breeds neglect? Unanticipated benefits of discontinuous primary care

Dorothy H Broom

National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia; E-mail: dorothy.broom{at}anu.edu.au

Background. Continuity of medical care is generally considered to be beneficial to patients.

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility that familiarity with patients may sometimes discourage case finding.

Methods. Extensive qualitative interviews were carried out with a sample of Australian adults with type 2 diabetes, focusing in particular on their experience of diagnosis.

Results. Interviews were conducted with 119 participants, 75% of whom supplied sufficient information to enable the coding of whether diagnosis occurred under circumstances of discontinuity. Half of all participants (two-thirds of the coded subsample) had a diagnosis that could be categorized as resulting from discontinuous primary care: hospital admission, change of doctor, patient initiative and/or diabetic emergency.

Conclusion. The same circumstances that enhance the management of chronic disease can at times hinder its diagnosis. Primary care service providers may need to instigate more active methods of case finding in order to avoid this paradoxical effect of familiarity with the patient.

Keywords. Diabetes, diagnosis, primary care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
M. C Gulliford, S. Naithani, and M. Morgan
Continuity of care and intermediate outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2007; 24(3): 245 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
M. C. Gulliford, S. Naithani, and M. Morgan
Measuring Continuity of Care in Diabetes Mellitus: An Experience-Based Measure
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 548 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.