Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by André, M
Right arrow Articles by Mölstad, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by André, M
Right arrow Articles by Mölstad, S
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 5, 514-519
© Oxford University Press 2003

The consultation

Use of rules of thumb in the consultation in general practice—an act of balance between the individual and the general perspective

M Andréa,b, L Borgquistb and S Mölstadb,c

a Centre for Clinical Research, Nissers väg 3, 791 82 Falun,
b Department of Health and Society, Primary Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping and
c Unit of Research and Development in Primary Care, 551 85 Jönköping, Sweden.

Correspondence to M André; E-mail: Malin.Andre{at}ltdalarna.se

Background. Rules of thumb used by GPs could be considered as empirical evidence of intuition and a link between science and practice in general practice.

Objective. The purpose of the present study was to analyse the description of the application of rules of thumb with regard to different situations in general practice.

Methods. An explorative and descriptive study was started with focus group interviews. Four groups with 23 GPs were interviewed. The interviews were transcribed and analysed, and the rules and their application were classified by an editing analysis.

Results. A specific set of rules of thumb was used for rapid assessment, when emergency and psychosocial problems were identified. When the main focus of the problems was identified as somatic or psychosocial, the GPs did not disregard the other aspects but described the use of rules in a simultaneous individualizing and generalizing process. The rules contained probability reasoning and risk assessment.

Conclusion. Rules of thumb seemed to serve as a link between theoretical knowledge and practical experience and were used by the GPs in an act of balance between the individual and the general perspective.

Keywords. Consultation, focus groups, general practice, heuristics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
M. A. Hani, H. Keller, J. Vandenesch, A. C Sonnichsen, F. Griffiths, and N. Donner-Banzhoff
Different from what the textbooks say: how GPs diagnose coronary heart disease
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2007; 24(6): 622 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
J. Gabbay and A. le May
Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines?" Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care
BMJ, October 30, 2004; 329(7473): 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.