Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blomgren, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pitkäranta, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blomgren, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pitkäranta, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 5, 524-527
© Oxford University Press 2003

Child health

Is it possible to diagnose acute otitis media accurately in primary health care?

Karin Blomgren and Anne Pitkäranta

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.

Correspondence to Dr Karin Blomgren, Kadetintie 14 A 6, FIN-00330 Helsinki, Finland; E-mail: karin.blomgren{at}fimnet.fi

Background. Acute otitis media causes human suffering and enormous costs to society. Symptoms of acute otitis media overlap those of the common cold, and diagnostic methods confirming the diagnosis are used only occasionally. Uncertainty in diagnostics may lead either to overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment or to underdiagnosis and an increase in complications.

Objective. Our aim was to evaluate the inter-rater agreement in diagnosis of acute otitis media for children in primary health care.

Methods. The GP on duty and the otorhinolaryngology resident at a primary health care clinic examined the same 50 children with caregiver-suspected acute otitis media. The otorhinolaryngologist photographed the tympanic membranes. Afterwards, two experienced clinicians evaluated the photographs with and without tympanograms. Diagnostic rates and diagnostic methods between clinicians were compared.

Results. The otorhinolaryngologist diagnosed acute otitis media in 44% and the GP in 64%. The GP based the diagnoses on symptoms and on the colour of the tympanic membrane, whereas the otorhinolaryngologist paid more attention to the movement and position of the tympanic membrane.

Conclusion. The use of a pneumatic otoscope and tympanometry reduces the number of acute otitis media diagnoses by >30%, suggesting that acute otitis media may be misdiagnosed often. Between clinicians, there was a substantial discrepancy in diagnoses of acute otitis media.

Keywords. Acute otitis media, children, diagnosis, primary health care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. Gisselsson-Solen, A. Bylander, C. Wilhelmsson, A. Hermansson, and A. Melhus
The Binax NOW Test as a Tool for Diagnosis of Severe Acute Otitis Media and Associated Complications
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2007; 45(9): 3003 - 3007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
R. J McManus, M Innes, and R Loudon
Diagnosis of acute otitis media in primary care
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2004; 21(2): 221 - 221.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.