Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, C.
Right arrow Articles by Haefeli, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, C.
Right arrow Articles by Haefeli, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 5, 528-530
© Oxford University Press 2003


Child health

Intention to breastfeed and other important health-related behaviour and beliefs during pregnancy

Cheryl Haslam, Wendy Lawrencea and Karen Haefeli

Institute of Work, Health and Organisations, University of Nottingham, William Lee Buildings 8, Nottingham Science and Technology Park, University Boulevard, Nottingham NG7 2RQ and
a MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.

Correspondence to Cheryl Haslam; E-mail: cheryl.haslam{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Background. It is widely accepted that breastfeeding is the best form of infant feeding for the first 4–6 months of life.

Objective. This study explored whether intention to breastfeed is associated with other positive maternal health-related behaviours and beliefs during pregnancy.

Method. A cross-sectional survey was carried out with 789 women attending antenatal clinics at Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust. A structured questionnaire assessed feeding intention, use of folic acid, vitamin and iron supplementation, smoking status, smoking stage of change, and fetal health locus of control during pregnancy.

Results. Forty percent of the women stated that they intended to breastfeed exclusively, 27% planned to bottle feed, 23% intended to combine breast and bottle feeding and 10% were undecided. Women planning to breastfeed (either exclusively or in combination with bottle feeding) were more likely than those with alternative feeding plans to: have increased their folic acid intake, taken vitamin/iron supplements and have a primarily internal locus of control (perceive themselves to have control over the health of their unborn baby). Women intending to breastfeed were also less likely to smoke. Of the women who did smoke, those planning to breastfeed were more likely to be either considering or preparing to quit smoking during their pregnancy.

Conclusion. In addition to educating pregnant smokers about the risks of maternal smoking, primary health care practitioners could also usefully address their knowledge, health beliefs and feeding intentions during antenatal care.

Keywords. Breastfeeding, fetal health locus of control, maternal smoking, vitamin and iron supplementation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
A. Tedstone, M. Browne, L. Harrop, C. Vernon, V. Page, J. Swindells, W. Hayward, J. Croft, F. Harris, and L. Stockley
Fortification of selected foodstuffs with folic acid in the UK: consumer research carried out to inform policy recommendations
J. Public Health Med., March 1, 2008; 30(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
W. T. Lawrence and C. Haslam
Smoking during Pregnancy: Where Next for Stage-based Interventions?
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 159 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
Recent References
J Hum Lact, February 1, 2004; 20(1): 106 - 112.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.