Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savage, I.
Right arrow Articles by Goodyer, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savage, I.
Right arrow Articles by Goodyer, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 5, 552-557
© Oxford University Press 2003


Information in practice

Providing information on metered dose inhaler technique: is multimedia as effective as print?

Imogen Savage and Larry Goodyer

Pharmacy Practice Group, King’s College London, Franklin Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 8WA, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Imogen Savage, Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, 29/39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK; E-mail: imogen.savage{at}ulsop.ac.uk

Background. Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are not easy to use well. Every MDI user receives a manufacturer’s patient information leaflet (PIL). However, not everyone is able or willing to read written information. Multimedia offers an alternative method for teaching or reinforcing correct inhaler technique.

Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of brief exposure to the same key information, given by PIL and multimedia touchscreen computer (MTS).

Methods. A single-blind randomized trial was conducted in 105 fluent English speakers (53% female; 93% White) aged 12–87 years in London general practices. All patients had had at least one repeat prescription for a bronchodilator MDI in the last 6 months. Inhaler technique was videotaped before and after viewing information from a PIL (n = 48) or MTS (n = 57). Key steps were rated blind using a checklist and videotape timings. The main outcome measures were a change in (i) global technique; (ii) co-ordination of inspiration and inhaler actuation; (iii) breathing-in time; and (iv) information acceptability.

Results. Initially, over a third of both groups had poor technique. After information, 44% (MTS) and 19% (PIL) were rated as improved. Co-ordination improved significantly after viewing information via MTS, but not after PIL. Breathing-in time increased significantly in both groups. Half the subjects said they had learned ‘something new’. The MTS group were more likely to mention co-ordination and breathing.

Conclusions. Short-term, multimedia is as least as effective as a good leaflet, and may have advantages for steps involving movement. MTS was acceptable to all age groups. The method could be used more widely in primary care.

Keywords. Medicines information, metered dose inhalers, patient education.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.