Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 5, 563-569
© Oxford University Press 2003
Information in practice |
The relationship between primary care physicians’ adherence to guidelines for the treatment of diabetes and patient satisfaction: findings from a pilot study
a JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem
b Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan
c Clalit Health Services
d Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Correspondence to Revital Gross, PhD, JDC-Brookdale Institute, POB 13087, Jerusalem 91130, Israel; E-mail: revital{at}jdc.org.il
Background. Adherence to clinical guidelines improves health care outcomes, reduces expenditure and prevents the complication of unnecessary interventions. It is uncertain what effect the adherence to guidelines for treating diabetes has on patient satisfaction. Some authors have reported that the use of guidelines does not affect patient satisfaction with care, and have concluded that satisfaction is related to a physician’s interpersonal skills, rather than to the quality of care. Others have reported that structured intervention programmes improve patient satisfaction with care.
Objective. The purpose of our study was to explore the association between adherence to clinical guidelines and satisfaction with care among diabetics.
Methods. The study population included 135 randomly sampled diabetes patients listed with 12 primary care physicians at two health plans in Israel, which together insure >80% of the population. Telephone interviews were conducted with the patients between August and November 2000, using structured questionnaires. Patients were asked to report on the extent to which their primary care physician treated them as indicated by the clinical guidelines of these health plans. They were also asked to rate their satisfaction with their primary care physician and the treatment of their disease. Bi-variate analysis was conducted using the chi-square statistical significance test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using logistic regression models.
Results. Adherence to guidelines for diabetes was associated with patient satisfaction with care, independently of the patient’s ethnicity (first language), age, gender, education, medication (insulin versus other) and health plan affiliation.
Conclusion. Patients who report being treated as recommended in practice guidelines were more likely to be satisfied with their care. This finding may encourage primary care physicians to adhere to clinical practice guidelines.
Keywords. Adherence, diabetes, guidelines, patient satisfaction.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. S. Tabrizi, A. J. Wilson, P. K. O'Rourke, and E. T. Coyne Patient Perspectives on Consistency of Medical Care With Recommended Care in Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, November 1, 2007; 30(11): 2855 - 2856. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. T. Chang, R. D. Hays, P. G. Shekelle, C. H. MacLean, D. H. Solomon, D. B. Reuben, C. P. Roth, C. J. Kamberg, J. Adams, R. T. Young, et al. Patients' Global Ratings of Their Health Care Are Not Associated with the Technical Quality of Their Care Ann Intern Med, May 2, 2006; 144(9): 665 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|