Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clemence, M. L
Right arrow Articles by Seamark, D. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clemence, M. L
Right arrow Articles by Seamark, D. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 5, 578-582
© Oxford University Press 2003


Health Services Research

GP referral for physiotherapy to musculoskeletal conditions—a qualitative study

Mark L Clemence and David A Seamarka

Physiotherapy Department, Torbay Hospital, Torquay TQ2 7AA and
a Honiton Research Practice, Marlpits Lane, Honiton EX14 2NY, UK.

Correspondence to Mark Clemence; E-mail: mclemence{at}connectfree.co.uk

Background. Little is known about the dynamics of GP referral for physiotherapy. Better understanding of this process is important because of the growing number of physiotherapy referrals by GPs.

Objectives. Our aim was to achieve insight into the experiences and views of patients, GPs and physiotherapists in relation to physiotherapy referral for musculoskeletal conditions.

Method. The study involved qualitative methodology using 22 semi-structured in-depth interviews. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were coded and analysed using the methods developed in grounded theory. Interviews were undertaken with GPs in primary care, Health Authority and hospital locations. Interviews with physiotherapists and patients were undertaken within community and district hospital locations.

Results. Three classifications of referral type were developed by the authors from the data, ‘appropriate referral’, ‘load-sharing referral’ and ‘dumping referral’. There are descriptions of influences on GP referral behaviour, physiotherapists’ response to appropriateness and expectations from the perspective of GPs and physiotherapists. Communication was shown as important in determining appropriate referral, but the quality of communication was variable. GPs’ past experience of physiotherapy significantly affected referral. Patients’ expectations about physiotherapy were described as variable and sometimes unrealistic.

Conclusions. The selection of appropriate referrals by GPs could be helped by improved communication and better definitions of appropriateness. Closer working between the two professions would result in the better management of problematic patients and prevent wasted resources through avoiding inappropriate referral. Written guidelines appeared to be of less use than direct contact. The concept of expectations appeared relevant to multiple aspects of physiotherapy referral.

Keywords. GPs, musculoskeletal problems, physiotherapy, referral.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.