Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 6, 623-627
© Oxford University Press 2003, all rights reserved
Article |
Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice?
Centre for Primary Care and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, a Primary Care Research Centre, University of Aarhus, Denmark and b Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
Correspondence to Professor George Freeman, Centre for Primary Care and Social Medicine, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, UK; E-mail: g.freeman{at}imperial.ac.uk
For a variety of reasons, GPs are working more and more with unfamiliar patients. The proposed new British GP contract stipulates that in future patients will register with a practice, rather than with a named GP and a recent new definition of general practice did not mention continuing care. There has been persistent confusion about the definition of continuity of care. Evidence for the benefit of patients usually seeing the same doctor is still limited. In this paper we describe some discrete elements of continuity, emphasize the importance of interpersonal continuity and suggest how this may work. The contributions of informational continuity (especially good records) and of excellent consulting skills are put in context. We conclude that further evidence is needed to demonstrate the added value of interpersonal continuity in general practice and that this needs a clear theoretical basis. We propose that such a theory will define the concept of multi-dimensional diagnosis as the key strength of our discipline and that continuity, especially interpersonal continuity, is an important factor in achieving this economically and in a way which satisfies both patients and professionals.
Keywords. Continuity of care, general practice.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Cheraghi-Sohi, A. R. Hole, N. Mead, R. McDonald, D. Whalley, P. Bower, and M. Roland What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients' Priorities Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2008; 6(2): 107 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C Gulliford, S. Naithani, and M. Morgan Continuity of care and intermediate outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus Fam. Pract., June 1, 2007; 24(3): 245 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Gulliford, S. Naithani, and M. Morgan Measuring Continuity of Care in Diabetes Mellitus: An Experience-Based Measure Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 548 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Rapport, M. A. Doel, D. Greaves, and G. Elwyn From manila to monitor: biographies of general practitioner workspaces. Health (London) , April 1, 2006; 10(2): 233 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. von Bultzingslowen, G. Eliasson, A. Sarvimaki, B. Mattsson, and P. Hjortdahl Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 210 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Stokes, C. Tarrant, A. G. Mainous III, H. Schers, G. Freeman, and R. Baker Continuity of Care: Is the Personal Doctor Still Important? A Survey of General Practitioners and Family Physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and the Netherlands Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2005; 3(4): 353 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Stokes, M. Dixon-Woods, and R. K McKinley Ending the doctor-patient relationship in general practice: a proposed model Fam. Pract., October 1, 2004; 21(5): 507 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|