Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donnan, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, F. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donnan, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, F. M
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 6, 706-710
© Oxford University Press 2003, all rights reserved

Article

Optimal strategies for identifying patients with myocardial infarction in general practice

Peter T Donnan, Hamish T Dougall and Frank M Sullivan

Tayside Centre for General Practice, Kirsty Semple Way, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 4BF, UK

Correspondence to Dr PT Donnan; E-mail: p.t.donnan{at}dundee.ac.uk

Background. In order to provide evidence-based secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) in general practice, eligible patients need to be identified. The optimal strategy is one in which all appropriate patients are identified with the least effort.

Objective. The purpose of the study was to determine the optimal strategy to identify subjects with a myocardial infarction (MI) from general practice records using different search criteria.

Methods. The study was a cross-sectional survey of 10 general practices in Tayside, Scotland. A random sample of all subjects aged over 35 (n = 5061) and registered with the general practices was obtained. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and yield (the number of records that need to be examined to detect a ‘true case’).

Results. Of the sample of 5061, 207 (4.1%) were defined to have had a ‘gold standard’ MI. A Read code for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) had the highest sensitivity (95%) but with a poor PPV (52%). All searches had high specificities. The addition of a record of hospitalization for MI to the Read code for MI gave 100% sensitivity and high yield (1 in 1.11). In situations where the Read coding is of poor quality, the alternative search strategy of a hospital record of MI or receiving aspirin or nitrates was optimum.

Conclusions. Patients who had experienced an MI can be easily identified from a combination of a Read code for MI and a record of hospitalization for an MI giving 100% sensitivity and specificity with a yield of 1 in 1.11.

Keywords. Coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, Read coding, secondary prevention.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 HeartHome page
L Wei, C C Lang, F M Sullivan, P Boyle, J Wang, S D Pringle, and T M MacDonald
Impact on mortality following first acute myocardial infarction of distance between home and hospital: cohort study
Heart, September 1, 2008; 94(9): 1141 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
L. Wei, S. Ebrahim, C. Bartlett, P. D Davey, F. M Sullivan, and T. M MacDonald
Statin use in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: cohort study and comparison of inclusion and outcome with patients in randomised trials
BMJ, April 9, 2005; 330(7495): 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.