Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butzlaff, M
Right arrow Articles by Lange, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butzlaff, M
Right arrow Articles by Lange, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 2, 183-188
Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 2 © Oxford University Press 2004, all rights reserved.


Article

Learning with computerized guidelines in general practice?

A randomized controlled trial

M Butzlaff, HC Vollmar, B Floer, N Koneczny, J Isfort and S Langea

Medical Knowledge Network evidence.de and a Grönemeyer Institute of Microtherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Germany

E-mail: butzlaff{at}uni-wh.de

Background. Evidence-based guidelines are seen as an important instrument to transfer scientifically generated knowledge into daily clinical practice and to ensure high standards of clinical care. Despite wide promulgation, clinical guidelines so far have a limited impact on individual professional learning and on changing daily medical practice.

Objectives. Our aims were (i) to study a potential knowledge increase among German GPs after implementation of web- and evidence-based guidelines and (ii) to identify and analyse potential barriers to individual professional learning with computerized guidelines.

Methods. A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted including 72 GPs (21% female, 79% male). The intervention group (n = 38) had access to clinical guidelines via the Internet or CD-ROM, the control group had not (n = 34). Both groups received a standardized two-part questionnaire. An increase of knowledge was measured with 25 multiple choice questions related to four different medical topics. In addition, reasons for using or not using computerized guidelines were analysed after access to guidelines was open to all participating physicians.

Results. There was no significant knowledge increase in the intervention group (P = 0.69). Twenty-two (58%) GPs of the intervention group had used the guidelines. Unspecified curiosity (76%) and a specific medical question (38%) were predominant motives for usage among physicians who had used the guidelines. Among ‘non-users’, 78% stated ‘lack of time’ as the main reason for not using guidelines.

Conclusion. An efficient knowledge transfer through computerized guidelines was not achieved. Usage, individual learning and potential implementation depend on adequate incentives and pragmatic aspects of clinical practice: easy and quick access.

Keywords. Clinical practice guidelines, evidence-based medicine, general practice, Internet, randomized controlled trial.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H. Varonen, J. Jousimaa, A. Helin-Salmivaara, and I. Kunnamo
Electronic primary care guidelines with links to Cochrane reviews--EBM Guidelines
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2005; 22(4): 465 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.