Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 4, 396-412
Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2004, all rights reserved.
Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review
Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffs ST5 5BG, UK
E-mail: k.p.jordan{at}keele.ac.uk
Background. Increased use of computers and morbidity coding in primary care delivery and research brings a need for evidence of the quality of general practice medical records.
Objective. Our aim was to assess the quality, in terms of completeness and correctness, of morbidity coding in computerized general practice records through a systematic review.
Methods. Published studies were identified by searches of electronic databases and citations of collected papers. Assessment of each article was made by two independent observers and discrepancies resolved by consensus. Studies were reviewed qualitatively due to their heterogeneity.
Results. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. There was variation in the methodology and quality of studies, and problems in generalizability. Studies have attempted to assess the completeness and correctness of morbidity registers by reference to a gold standard such as paper notes, prescribing information or diagnostic tests and procedures, each of which has problems. A consistent finding was that quality of recording varied between morbidities. One reason for this may be in distinctiveness of diagnosis (e.g. coding of diabetes tended to be of higher quality than coding of asthma).
Conclusions. This review highlights the problems faced in assessing the completeness and correctness of computerized general practice medical records. However, it also suggests that a high quality of coding can be achieved. The focus should now be on methods to encourage and help practices improve the quality of their coding.
Keywords. Medical records, primary care, systematic review.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-K. Soler, I. Okkes, M. Wood, and H. Lamberts The coming of age of ICPC: celebrating the 21st birthday of the International Classification of Primary Care Fam. Pract., June 17, 2008; (2008) cmn028v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P Klein Woolthuis, W. J. de Grauw, W. H. van Gerwen, H. J. van den Hoogen, E. H van de Lisdonk, J. F. Metsemakers, and C. van Weel Identifying people at risk for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes using the GP's electronic medical record Fam. Pract., June 14, 2007; (2007) cmm018v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Calvert, R. J McManus, and N. Freemantle The management of people with type 2 diabetes with hypoglycaemic agents in primary care: retrospective cohort study Fam. Pract., June 1, 2007; 24(3): 224 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Brouwer, P. Bindels, and H. Weert Data quality improvement in general practice Fam. Pract., October 1, 2006; 23(5): 529 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Lusignan and C. van Weel The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 253 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Deckers, W J. Paget, F. G Schellevis, and D. M Fleming European primary care surveillance networks: their structure and operation Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 151 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Downs, S. Turner, M. Bryans, J. Wilcock, J. Keady, E. Levin, R. O'Carroll, K. Howie, and S. Iliffe Effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection and management of dementia in primary care: cluster randomised controlled study. BMJ, March 25, 2006; 332(7543): 692 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jordan, M. Porcheret, U. T. Kadam, and P. Croft The use of general practice consultation databases in rheumatology research Rheumatology, February 1, 2006; 45(2): 126 - 128. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Buurma, P. A. De Smet, M. Kruijtbosch, and A. C. Egberts Disease and Intolerability Documentation in Electronic Patient Records Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2005; 39(10): 1640 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



