Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Croft, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Croft, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 4, 396-412
Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2004, all rights reserved.

Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review

Kelvin Jordan, Mark Porcheret and Peter Croft

Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffs ST5 5BG, UK

E-mail: k.p.jordan{at}keele.ac.uk

Background. Increased use of computers and morbidity coding in primary care delivery and research brings a need for evidence of the quality of general practice medical records.

Objective. Our aim was to assess the quality, in terms of completeness and correctness, of morbidity coding in computerized general practice records through a systematic review.

Methods. Published studies were identified by searches of electronic databases and citations of collected papers. Assessment of each article was made by two independent observers and discrepancies resolved by consensus. Studies were reviewed qualitatively due to their heterogeneity.

Results. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. There was variation in the methodology and quality of studies, and problems in generalizability. Studies have attempted to assess the completeness and correctness of morbidity registers by reference to a gold standard such as paper notes, prescribing information or diagnostic tests and procedures, each of which has problems. A consistent finding was that quality of recording varied between morbidities. One reason for this may be in distinctiveness of diagnosis (e.g. coding of diabetes tended to be of higher quality than coding of asthma).

Conclusions. This review highlights the problems faced in assessing the completeness and correctness of computerized general practice medical records. However, it also suggests that a high quality of coding can be achieved. The focus should now be on methods to encourage and help practices improve the quality of their coding.

Keywords. Medical records, primary care, systematic review.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J.-K. Soler, I. Okkes, M. Wood, and H. Lamberts
The coming of age of ICPC: celebrating the 21st birthday of the International Classification of Primary Care
Fam. Pract., June 17, 2008; (2008) cmn028v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
E. P Klein Woolthuis, W. J. de Grauw, W. H. van Gerwen, H. J. van den Hoogen, E. H van de Lisdonk, J. F. Metsemakers, and C. van Weel
Identifying people at risk for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes using the GP's electronic medical record
Fam. Pract., June 14, 2007; (2007) cmm018v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. J Calvert, R. J McManus, and N. Freemantle
The management of people with type 2 diabetes with hypoglycaemic agents in primary care: retrospective cohort study
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2007; 24(3): 224 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H. Brouwer, P. Bindels, and H. Weert
Data quality improvement in general practice
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2006; 23(5): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
S. de Lusignan and C. van Weel
The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 253 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. G. Deckers, W J. Paget, F. G Schellevis, and D. M Fleming
European primary care surveillance networks: their structure and operation
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 151 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Downs, S. Turner, M. Bryans, J. Wilcock, J. Keady, E. Levin, R. O'Carroll, K. Howie, and S. Iliffe
Effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection and management of dementia in primary care: cluster randomised controlled study.
BMJ, March 25, 2006; 332(7543): 692 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. Jordan, M. Porcheret, U. T. Kadam, and P. Croft
The use of general practice consultation databases in rheumatology research
Rheumatology, February 1, 2006; 45(2): 126 - 128.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
H. Buurma, P. A. De Smet, M. Kruijtbosch, and A. C. Egberts
Disease and Intolerability Documentation in Electronic Patient Records
Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2005; 39(10): 1640 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.