Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on March 16, 2005
Family Practice 2005 22(3):328-334; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh730
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice
a General Practice and Primary Care, Division of Community-based Sciences, University of Glasgow, 1 Horeselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, b Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Boyd Orr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ and c Department of Community Health Sciences-General Practice Section, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, UK. d Highlands and Islands Health Research Institute, University of Aberdeen, Inverness IV2 3ED, UK
Correspondence to Dr S Mercer; Email: stewmercer{at}_blueyonder.co.uk
Background. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure has been developed as a tool for assessing the patients' perceptions of relational empathy in the consultation.
Objectives. The present paper provides performance data on the CARE measure in a large sample of general practice consultations in areas of high and low deprivation.
Methods. The CARE Measure was included in a self-completed questionnaire study involving 3044 patients attending 26 GPs in 26 different practices (16 in areas of high socio-economic deprivation and 10 in low deprivation areas, in the west of Scotland).
Results. GPs and patients, in both high and low deprivation settings, endorsed the relevance of the CARE Measure. Overall, 76% of patients rated the measure as being 'very important' to their current consultation. Higher rating of importance were observed in older patients, patients consulting with psycho-social problems, patients with long-standing illness or disability, and patients with significant emotional distress. Few patients rated individual CARE Measure items as being 'not applicable' to their current consultation; only 3.1% of patients felt that more than 2 of the 10 items in the measure did not apply to their current consultation. Mean values were not influenced by deprivation, gender, reason for consulting, chronic illness, or emotional distress. Correlational analysis indicated that a sample size of 50 patients is sufficient to reliably estimate mean CARE score for an individual GP.
Conclusions. These results indicate that the CARE Measure is considered by GPs and patients alike as being of direct relevance to everyday consultations in general practice, in both high and low deprivation settings. The measures is stable across patient groups and a reliable estimate of perceived GP empathy requires 50 completed questionnaires per doctor.
Keywords. Appraisal, CARE Measure, consultations, deprivation, empathy, general practice.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. R. Wheatley, M. A. Kelley, N. Peacock, and J. Delgado Women's Narratives on Quality in Prenatal Care: A Multicultural Perspective Qual Health Res, November 1, 2008; 18(11): 1586 - 1598. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. W. Mercer and G. C. M. Watt The Inverse Care Law: Clinical Primary Care Encounters in Deprived and Affluent Areas of Scotland Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2007; 5(6): 503 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. G Evans, A. Edwards, S. Evans, B. Elwyn, and G. Elwyn Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 117 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|