Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on July 29, 2005
Family Practice 2005 22(6):617-623; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi075
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/6/617    most recent
cmi075v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, P.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, P.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Screening for domestic violence in a predominantly Hispanic clinical setting

Ping-Hsin Chen, Sue Rovi, Marielos Vega, Abbie Jacobs and Mark S Johnson

Department of Family Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey—New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.

Correspondence to Ping-Hsin Chen, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ—NJMS, 185 S. Orange Avenue, MSB, B648 Newark, NJ, USA; Email: chenpi{at}umdnj.edu

Background. Domestic violence is a public health problem that is common across ethnic groups. The utility of validated screening tools to detect abuse in diverse populations remains largely unknown.

Objective. The purpose of the study was to test the reliability and validity of a brief 4-question instrument, HITS, among predominantly Hispanic women.

Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study in an urban clinical setting. Two hundred and two women completed HITS and two other previously validated tools, the Index of Spouse Abuse-Physical Scale (ISA-P) and the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST). Instruments were prepared in English and translated to Spanish. Reliability and validity of HITS were compared with the ISA-P and WAST. Performance measures of HITS were compared with the ISA-P or WAST as a criterion standard.

Results. Cronbach's alphas were 0.76 and 0.61 for the English version and Spanish version of HITS, respectively. When administered first and analysed alone, the Spanish version of HITS had a reliability of 0.71. For both English and Spanish versions HITS was significantly correlated to ISA-P and WAST. The English HITS version had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 99%. A cut-off score of 5.5 for Spanish HITS version achieved a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 86%.

Conclusions. HITS demonstrated good reliability and validity with ISA-P in English speaking patients. The Spanish version of HITS showed moderate reliability and good validity with WAST in Spanish speaking patients. HITS may help physicians detect abuse in predominantly Hispanic clinical settings.

Keywords. Battered women, domestic violence, spouse abuse.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
P.-H. Chen, S. Rovi, J. Washington, A. Jacobs, M. Vega, K.-Y. Pan, and M. S. Johnson
Randomized Comparison of 3 Methods to Screen for Domestic Violence in Family Practice
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2007; 5(5): 430 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
M. B. Phelan
Screening for Intimate Partner Violence in Medical Settings
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2007; 8(2): 199 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.