Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on July 29, 2005
Family Practice 2005 22(6):653-657; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/6/653    most recent
cmi063v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKinstry, B.
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKinstry, B.
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Is success in postgraduate examinations associated with family practitioners' attitudes or patient perceptions of the quality of their consultations? A cross-sectional study of the MRCGP examination in Great Britain

Brian McKinstrya, Bruce Guthrieb, George Freemanc and David Heaneyd

a Chief Scientist Office Career Fellow, University of Edinburgh, b Health Foundation/Chief Scientist Office Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Dundee, c Professor Emeritus of General Practice, Imperial College London and d Senior Researcher, University of Aberdeen. Email: brian.mckinstry{at}ed.ac.uk

Background. Postgraduate examinations are ubiquitous in medicine worldwide, but studies to validate them are rare. The Royal College of General Practitioners of the UK, over the years in an evolving format, has offered a membership examination (MRCGP) which it believes acts as a quality marker for those who sit it and also positively influences the development of family practice generally. It is not clear, however, if this process identifies quality markers that patients can perceive.

Objectives. To determine if possession of the MRCGP (a doctor defined measure of doctor quality) is associated with the patient enablement score (a patient based consultation outcome measure) and family practitioners' attitudes to the work of family practice.

Methods. Design: survey using the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) with linked survey data on family practitioner (FP) demography and possession of the MRCGP, and FPs' attitudes and beliefs using the Cockburn attitudinal questionnaire. Subjects: 15 534 adult patients attending 154 FP principals. Setting: 50 family practices in the UK. Outcome measures: the association between possession of MRCGP, and PEI and Cockburn scores was assessed using regression analysis controlling for known confounders.

Results. There was no association between PEI score and possession of the MRCGP. Only one scale of the Cockburn attitude questionnaire (the belief that patients should be involved in decision making) was positively associated with possessing the MRCGP.

Conclusion. Any advantage in physician quality conferred by passing the MRCGP exam was not detected in this study. Further research into the predictive validity of postgraduate examinations is required preferably using a wider variety of patient and audit based methods.

Keywords. Family practice, medical education, physician–patient relations, professional competence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.