Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on October 5, 2005
Family Practice 2006 23(1):10-14; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/10    most recent
cmi034v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, O.
Right arrow Articles by Fukui, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, O.
Right arrow Articles by Fukui, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease

Osamu Takahashia, Takuro Shimbob, Mahbubur Rahmanc, Rahman Musaa, Wataru Kurokawad, Takeshi Yoshinakae and Tsuguya Fukuif

a Department of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, b Department of Medical Ecology and Informatics Research Institute, International Medical Center of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, c Marshfield Epidemiology Research Center, Marshfield Clinic, USA, d Kosei-kai Yotsubashi Clinic, Osaka, Japan, e Kyoto Hoken-Kai Kamigyo Hospital, Kyoto, Japan, f St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to Tsuguya Fukui, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan; Email: fkts{at}luke.or.jp

Background. The Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been shown to be useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Ankle systolic blood pressures are measured by a Doppler device; however, general physicians cannot always use it in daily practice. The ausculutatory method (AUS) is an alternative method and quite easy to perform, but has not yet been validated in diagnosing PAD.

Objective. To validate AUS for diagnosing PAD based on ABI, compared with Doppler method as gold standard.

Methods. Cross-sectional study. Study subjects were 119 patients aged 50 years and older, who were consecutively admitted to the division of general internal medicine in two community hospitals in Japan. We measured the systolic blood pressures of the brachial and the posterior tibial arteries by two methods. We calculated the ABI from the systolic blood pressure obtained by these two methods. PAD was considered to be present when ABI ≤0.90 by the Doppler method.

Results. PAD was diagnosed in 22 (18.5%) of 119 patients. Korotkoff sounds of legs were inaudible by AUS in 47 (39.5%) patients. The likelihood ratios for diagnosing PAD patients by AUS were 2.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.9) in cases with inaudible Korotkoff sounds, 0.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 1.9) when ABI ≤0.9 and 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.4) when ABI >0.9.

Conclusions. While AUS is not efficient enough to confirm the presence of PAD based on ABI, it could be clinically useful in excluding PAD when ABI >0.90. When measuring ankle blood pressure by AUS in the daily practice, it is important to realise its strengths and weaknesses.

Keywords. Ankle-brachial index, auscultation, Doppler, peripheral arterial disease, sensitivity and specificity, ultrasonography.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. Migliacci, R. Nasorri, P. Ricciarini, and P. Gresele
Ankle-brachial index measured by palpation for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2008; 25(4): 228 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.