Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on February 3, 2006
Family Practice 2006 23(2):175-179; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi122
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/2/175    most recent
cmi122v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuyvenhoven, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verheij, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuyvenhoven, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verheij, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Management of upper respiratory tract infections in Dutch general practice; antibiotic prescribing rates and incidences in 1987 and 2001

Maria Kuyvenhoven, Gerrit van Essen, François Schellevisa and Theo Verheij

UMC Utrecht–Julius Centrum, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands and a NIVEL.

Correspondence to Maria Kuyvenhoven, UMC Utrecht–Julius Centrum, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; Email: m.m.kuyvenhoven{at}umcutrecht.nl

Background and aim. This study aims to assess differences in antibiotic prescribing and incidence of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTIs) between 1987 and 2001, before (1987) and after (2001) publication of Dutch guidelines on URTIs.

Design, setting and method. Data were collected in two national surveys: 96 general practices (n = 344 449 patients) in 1987 and 90 general practices (n = 358 008 patients) in 2001. Outcome measures were: (1) antibiotic prescribing rates for acute otitis media (AOM), common cold, sinusitis and acute tonsillitis; (2) number of antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 patients per year; (3) incidence rates per 1000 patients per year.

Results. Antibiotic prescribing rates in AOM and common cold were increased in 2001 compared to 1987 (from 27% to 48%; from 17% to 23%, respectively), while the rates for sinusitis and acute tonsillitis were about the same (72% and 70%; 74% and 72%, respectively). Except for AOM, the number of antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 patients decreased by 30% to 50%. As incidence rates of common cold, tonsillitis and sinusitis decreased, the decline in the total volume of antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 patients for these three categories has mainly to be attributed to a fall of incidence rates.

Conclusion. Antibiotic prescribing rates for URTIs have not declined between 1987 and 2001, but the volumes for common cold, sinusitis and tonsillitis have fallen down mainly attributable to declined incidences, which have probably been caused by a reduced inclination of patients to present respiratory illness to their GP. Prescribing antibiotics for AOM has increased.

Keywords. Family medicine, prescribing, respiratory medicine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Zhang, L. A. Garcia Rodriguez, and S. Hernandez-Diaz
Antibiotic Use and the Risk of Lung Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1308 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.