Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on May 26, 2006
Family Practice 2006 23(5):568-577; doi:10.1093/fampra/cml018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/568    most recent
cml018v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diokno, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, R. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diokno, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, R. B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Perceptions and behaviours of women with bladder control problems

Ananias C Dioknoa, Peter K Sandb, Scott Macdiarmidc, Rajul Shahd and Robert B Armstrongd

a Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, MI, USA
b Division of Urogynecology, Evanston Continence Center, Northwestern University Medical School Evanston, IL, USA
c Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem, NC, USA
d Ortho-McNeil Neurologics Inc. Titusville, NJ, USA

Correspondence to: Ananias C. Diokno, M.D., William Beaumont Hospital, 3535 West 13 Mile Road, Suite 438, Royal Oak, MI 48073-6710, USA; E-mail adiokno{at}beaumont.edu

Objectives. To evaluate women's perceptions about bladder control problems.

Methods. 757 women with one or more bladder control symptoms (frequency, urgency, stress or urge urinary incontinence and nocturia) participated in an Internet-based survey. A separate study involved 12 focus groups including a total of 180 women with bladder control problems.

Results. Respondents in the survey reported multiple symptoms, e.g. stress urinary incontinence (72%), frequency (56%), nocturia (45%), urge urinary incontinence (43%) and urgency (33%). Women in both the survey and the focus groups revealed extensive use of coping mechanisms to manage their symptoms. The focus groups revealed that many women were not aware that overactive bladder (OAB) is a pathophysiological condition. Approximately 30% of respondents in the survey felt uncomfortable talking to their doctor about their condition. Among women who did speak with their doctor, stress-related symptoms were described more readily than urge-related symptoms. In the survey, only about half (56%) of the women felt their OAB medication was effective, and half (50%) stopped taking their medication at some point. Information from the focus groups suggested that some women may have unrealistic expectations of onset of efficacy or extent of benefit and may be unprepared for managing side effects.

Conclusions. Feelings of embarrassment and limited understanding of the pathophysiology of OAB can contribute to miscommunication between a woman and her doctor. Patient education regarding reasonable expectations coupled with suggestions for coping with unwanted side effects will likely result in better management.

Keywords. Overactive bladder, population-based survey, women, behaviours, attitudes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.