Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2006
Family Practice 2007 24(1):65-70; doi:10.1093/fampra/cml062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/65    most recent
cml062v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moffat, M.
Right arrow Articles by Price, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moffat, M.
Right arrow Articles by Price, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study

Mandy Moffat, Jennifer Cleland, Thys van der Molen and David Price

Departments of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Correspondence to Mandy Moffat, Department of General Practice & Primary Care, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, UK; Email: m.moffat{at}abdn.ac.uk

Received 21 March 2006; Accepted 25 October 2006.


   Abstract

Background. Despite asthma being primarily managed in general practice and primary care, there is little research into the issues and tools which may impact on managing poorly controlled asthma in this setting.

Objective. To explore the views of health care professionals (HCPs) towards asthma guidelines and self-management plans (SMPs) to identify why these are not used routinely in general practice.

Methods. Data from 54 HCPs [GPs and practice nurses (PNs)] in north-east Scotland were collected via qualitative interviews and focus groups. Participant views and experience of asthma guidelines and SMPs were explored.

Results. Participants had mainly positive attitudes towards guidelines and SMPs, although both were used only when deemed suitable by the individual. Suitability depended on individual patient issues (e.g. psychosocial factors, level of control) and/or professional issues (e.g. ease of use, time available, job roles). Patient issues were viewed as impacting on asthma control directly and, indirectly, as the main reason for not using guidelines or SMPs with a patient. HCPs reported lacking necessary communication skills for dealing with patient asthma control issues, particularly where these were non-medical. Professional and organizational issues such as training and communication were also perceived as impairing asthma management.

Conclusion. Our findings indicate that guidelines are seen as providing the ‘why’ of helping asthma patients' self-manage but not the ‘what to...’ or ‘how to...’ communicate. Poor professional–patient communication seems largely to explain the poor uptake of SMPs and guideline use in general practice and primary care. This limitation is more obvious to professionals when they are working with patients with poorly controlled asthma. There is a need to identify key communication skills for effective professional–patient partnership in adult asthma management, and to develop robust strategies for effectively training GPs and PNs in enhancing these skills.

Keywords. Chronic disease management, communication skills, doctor–patient relationship, qualitative research, respiratory medicine.


Moffat M, Cleland J, van der Molen T, Price D. Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study. Family Practice 2007; 24: 65–70.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.