Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on January 20, 2007
Family Practice 2007 24(2):108-116; doi:10.1093/fampra/cml068
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/2/108    most recent
cml068v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bamford, C.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bamford, C.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Can primary care record review facilitate earlier diagnosis of dementia?

Claire Bamford, Martin Eccles, Nick Steen and Louise Robinson

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK

Correspondence to Professor Martin Eccles, Institute of Health and Society, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK; Email: martin.eccles{at}ncl.ac.uk

Received 1 March 2006; Revised 19 October 2006; Accepted 14 November 2006.


   Abstract

Background. There is concern over delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care.

Objective. To determine whether primary care record review can facilitate earlier diagnosis of dementia.

Methods. Retrospective notes-based case–control study. Older people with dementia (cases) were identified through older age psychiatrists in the north-east of England. Age- and sex-matched controls were identified in primary care. Frequency and place of consultations, symptoms, presentation, tests and investigations, management, referrals and selected prescription data during the 5 years prior to the diagnosis of dementia were recorded.

Results. Relevant symptoms, involvement of family members, unpredictable consulting patterns and problems with management were more likely to be recorded in the notes of cases than controls. Key variables predicting subsequent diagnosis of dementia included the absence of nurse and outpatient consultations and the presence of cognitive symptoms, consultations with primary care physicians and referral for clarification of diagnosis or management. Regression models were better at predicting cases (sensitivity = 80.2%) than controls (specificity = 69.8%). Applying the models to a typical primary care physician's list would result in the identification of 93 false positives in order to identify two new cases 18 months earlier than currently occurs.

Conclusions. Differences in consultation patterns can be observed up to 4 years prior to formal diagnosis of dementia, indicating that primary care physicians are attending to possible signs of early dementia. However, it is not practicable to use the systematic review of primary care records to facilitate earlier diagnosis without identifying large numbers of false positives requiring investigation.

Keywords. Ageing, case–control studies, dementia, early diagnosis, primary health care.


Bamford C, Eccles M, Steen N and Robinson L. Can primary care record review facilitate earlier diagnosis of dementia? Family Practice 2007; 24: 108–116.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.