Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on March 29, 2007
Family Practice 2007 24(3):259-262; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/3/259    most recent
cmm005v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dean, S. C
Right arrow Articles by Oakeshott, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dean, S. C
Right arrow Articles by Oakeshott, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Pilot study of potential barriers to blood pressure control in patients with inadequately controlled hypertension

Sally C Deana, Sally M Kerrya, Francesco P Cappucciob and Pippa Oakeshotta

a Department of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, UK
b Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK. Correspondence to: Sally C. Dean, Department of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK. Email: sally.dean@sgul.ac.uk

Received 23 December 2005; Revised 21 December 2006; Accepted 1 February 2004.


   Abstract

Background. Most people with high blood pressure (BP) are managed in primary care, but BP control is often inadequate.

Objectives. To examine potential barriers to adequate BP control in patients with poorly controlled hypertension.

Design. Cross-sectional survey.

Setting. Computerized inner city general practice.

Participants. A total of 155 hypertensive patients aged 50–80 years with last recorded BP ≥150/90 mm Hg (or ≥140/85 mm Hg if diabetic).

Methods. Patients were invited to attend a nurse-led clinic where BP was measured according to a standardized protocol and patients were asked to complete a semi-structured questionnaire including lifestyle, compliance with treatment and knowledge about hypertension. Details of BP reviews were obtained from medical records.

Results. A total of 110 patients (71%) with a mean age of 65 years attended the nurse-led clinic of whom 27% were of African origin. Of those who attended, 52 (47%) had adequately controlled BP when measured according to protocol. The remaining 58 (53%) had inadequately controlled BP. Of patients on treatment, 94% (83/88) reported taking it at least 6 days a week. Only 9% of patients knew their target BP and only 39% that treatment aims to prevent stroke or heart attack. Patients with diabetes were more likely than those without to have BP ≥ audit standard (79% 26/33 versus 42% 32/77, P < 0.001).

Conclusion. About half of apparently uncontrolled hypertensive patients had BP below target when measured according to standard methods. Reported compliance was good, but patient knowledge of target BP was poor. Patients with diabetes were more likely than those without to have inadequately controlled BP.

Keywords. Blood pressure control, primary care, barriers.


Dean SC, Kerry SM, Cappuccio FP, Oakeshott P. Pilot study of potential barriers to blood pressure control in patients with inadequately controlled hypertension. Family Practice 2007; 24: 259–262.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
B. Delaney
Engaging practitioners in research; time to change the values of practice rather than the way research is carried out?
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2007; 24(3): 207 - 208.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.