Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on June 29, 2007
Family Practice 2007 24(4):295-301; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/4/295    most recent
cmm022v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, M.
Right arrow Articles by Little, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, M.
Right arrow Articles by Little, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press.

Humidified air inhalation for treating croup: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Michael Moorea and Paul Littleb

a Three Swans Surgery, Rollestone Street, Salisbury SP1 1DX, UK
b Department of Community Clinical Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK

Correspondence to M. Moore, Three Swans Surgery, Rollestone Street, Salisbury SP1 1DX, UK; Email: mvm198{at}soton.ac.uk

Received 2 November 2006; Revised 21 March 2007; Accepted 25 April 2007.


  Abstract

Background. Croup (laryngotracheobronchitis) is a common cause of upper airway obstruction in children. Treatment with humidified air was previously widely used and is still commonly recommended as home treatment.

Objective. To assess the efficacy of humidified air in the treatment of croup.

Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE.

Review methods. We included randomized controlled trials with or without blinding. All studies treating children with a clinical diagnosis of croup with warm or cool humidified air delivered by steam or humidified tent whether inpatients, attenders at the Emergency Department or in the community were eligible.

Main results. Three studies in emergency settings provided data on 135 patients with moderate croup for the main outcome (croup score). The combined results from 20 to 60 minutes in the three studies marginally favoured the treatment group with a weighted standardized mean difference of –0.14 (95% confidence interval = –0.75 to 0.47). No outcomes were significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions. The croup score of children managed in an emergency setting with mild to moderate croup probably does not improve greatly with inhalation of humidified air. There is insufficient evidence to exclude either a small beneficial or a harmful effect.

Keywords. Cochrane, emergency medicine, meta-analysis, paediatrics, respiratory medicine.

Moore M, Little P. Humidified air inhalation for treating croup: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Family Practice 2007; 24: 295–301.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.