Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on May 29, 2007
Family Practice 2007 24(4):388-394; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/4/388    most recent
cmm019v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, F. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

An analysis of factors that predict patient consent to take part in a randomized controlled trial

Kate Fletcher, Jonathan Mant, Roger Holder, David Fitzmaurice, Gregory YH Lip and FD Richard Hobbs

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

Correspondence to: Kate Fletcher, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Email: k.fletcher{at}bham.ac.uk

Received 26 May 2006; Revised 21 March 2007; Accepted 21 March 2007.


   Abstract

Background. Recruitment targets of patients to multi-centre primary care-based randomized controlled trials (RCT) are often not met. A critical step in the pathway is whether an eligible patient will give consent.

Objective. To assess whether patient, practice or practitioner characteristics are associated with a patient's likelihood of giving consent to participation in a large primary care-based RCT.

Methods. A cross-sectional study of patients from 260 practices in England and Wales who met the eligibility criteria for an RCT of aspirin versus warfarin for stroke prevention and attended an appointment with their GP to consider trial participation. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which patient and practitioner factors independently predicted whether or not a patient would give consent to take part in the trial.

Results. Of the 1740 patients, 973 (55.9%) gave consent. On multivariable analysis, patient factors associated with increased likelihood of giving consent were younger age, current use of warfarin and year of recruitment to the trial. Patients with a history of transient ischaemic attack, angina or valve disease were less likely to give consent. Practice/practitioner factors that were associated with increased likelihood of consent were smaller practice size (practices with greater than eight GPs as compared with those with one to two GPs, odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.21–0.75) and older GPs.

Conclusions. The strong association of consent with year of recruitment may be due to changes in trial procedures and investigator training. If so, this has important implications for the conduct of future trials.

Keywords. Consent, primary care, RCT, recruitment.


Fletcher K, Mant J, Holder R, Fitzmaurice D, Lip GYH and Hobbs FDR. An analysis of factors that predict patient consent to take part in a randomized controlled trial. Family Practice 2007; 24: 388–394.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.