Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on August 4, 2007
Family Practice 2007 24(5):443-453; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/5/443    most recent
cmm036v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peat, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bedson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peat, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Knee pain and osteoarthritis in the general population: what influences patients to consult?

John Bedson, Sara Mottram, Elaine Thomas and George Peat

Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK

Correspondence to John Bedson; Email: j.bedson{at}cphc.keele.ac.uk

Received 17 October 2006; Revised 6 May 2007; Accepted 17 June 2007.


   Abstract

Background. We examined the relationship between predisposing factors, enabling factors and need-related factors with consultation for knee pain in general practice.

Methods. This was a retrospective review of computerized medical records for knee-related consultations in the 18 months before baseline assessment of individuals aged over 50 years reporting knee pain in the previous 12 months. The association between each factor and consultation for consulters compared to non-consulters was summarized using odds ratios (ORs). Interaction between each variable and chronic pain grade was investigated. The association between knee-related consultation and the number and type of other co-morbid consultations was then determined.

Results. In total, 742 participants were assessed. Of these, 209 (28%) had a knee-related consultation in the previous 18 months. Recent onset of pain [OR 3.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.8, 5.7] and severity of pain, Grade III/IV (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.1, 5.6), were associated with knee-related consultation. Those rating their knee problem as a health priority were more likely to consult (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.6, 6.7). Irrespective of knee pain severity, there was no difference in the median number of co-morbid consultations between knee consulters and knee non-consulters.

Conclusions.Need-related factors appeared to be associated with the decision to consult about knee pain. Neither the presence of self-reported selected co-morbid conditions nor the total number of co-morbid conditions was related to consultations for knee pain. Nevertheless, 50% of those with severely disabling knee pain still did not consult for it. Further investigation of this is important in order to optimize care for patients with knee pain and co-morbid disease.

Keywords. Epidemiology, family medicine, pain, rheumatology.


Bedson J, Mottram S, Thomas E and Peat G. Knee pain and osteoarthritis in the general population: what influences patients to consult? Family Practice 2007; 24: 443–453.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.