Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2007
Family Practice 2007 24(6):532-537; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm068
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/6/532    most recent
cmm068v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shapley, M.
Right arrow Articles by Croft, P. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shapley, M.
Right arrow Articles by Croft, P. R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Abnormal bleeding patterns associated with menorrhagia in women in the community and in women presenting to primary care

Mark Shapley, Kelvin Jordan and Peter R Croft

Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK

Correspondence to Mark Shapley, Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK; Email: m.shapley{at}cphc.keele.ac.uk

Received 5 July 2006; Revised 27 June 2007; Accepted 15 October 2007.


   Abstract

Background. There is an assumption that in women with menorrhagia ‘excessive menstrual loss in regular cycles is the most common clinical presentation’ yet epidemiological studies show irregular cycles and bleeding are common.

Objectives. To test the hypothesis that, in women who present to primary care with menorrhagia, excessive menstrual loss in regular cycles is the most common clinical presentation, and to determine the frequency with which symptoms known to be associated with gynaecological malignancy occur.

Methods. A postal survey of all women aged 18–54 years was used to identify symptoms of vaginal bleeding in an urban general practice with 10 000 registered patients. Follow-up surveys were carried out at 6 and 12 months. Consultation data from general practice held records were gathered from baseline to 18 months. Women who consulted with increased vaginal bleeding during the 18-month study period were separately analysed according to their self-reported symptoms in the questionnaire completed in the 6 months prior to the consultation.

Results. At baseline, of the 736 women in the community identified with menorrhagia, 46% had at least one symptom of irregular vaginal bleeding. In the subgroup of 138 women with menorrhagia who consulted primary care with increased vaginal bleeding, the proportion with at least one symptom of irregular vaginal bleeding was 73%.

Conclusion. In women with heavy menstrual bleeding, excessive menstrual loss in regular cycles is not the most common clinical presentation in primary care. Guidelines on menorrhagia should acknowledge the variety of symptoms that women with heavy menstrual bleeding present to primary care.

Keywords. Epidemiology, menorrhagia, menstruation disorders, primary care, vaginal bleeding.


Shapley M, Jordan K and Croft PR. Abnormal bleeding patterns associated with menorrhagia in women in the community and in women presenting to primary care. Family Practice 2007; 24: 532–537.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.