Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on May 25, 2008
Family Practice 2008 25(3):162-167; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/3/162    most recent
cmn020v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varonen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varonen, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians

Helena Varonena, Tiina Kortteistob, Minna Kailac and for the EBMeDS Study Group

a Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
b University of Tampere
c FinOHTA and Paediatric Research Centre, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere

Correspondence to Helena Varonen, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Helsinki, Kytösuontie 11, PL 49 00014 Helsinki, Finland; Email: helena.varonen{at}helsinki.fi

Received 4 October 2007; Revised 18 March 2008; Accepted 14 April 2008.


   Abstract

Objectives. To identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementing computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) in health care as perceived by clinicians.

Methods. We carried out a qualitative focus group study with primary and secondary health care settings in six areas of Finland. A total of 39 interviewed physicians, of whom 22 practised in primary care and 17 in secondary care. The main outcome measures physicians’ expectations, preconceived barriers and facilitators were explicitly identified by the participants during the interviews.

Results. Identified barriers were earlier experience of dysfunctional computer systems in health care, potential harm to doctor–patient relationship, obscured responsibilities, threats to clinician's autonomy and potential extra workload due to excessive reminders. Identified facilitators were self-control of frequency and contents of CDSS and noticeable help of CDSS in clinical practice. It was easy for the physicians to think of applications and clinical topics for CDSS that could help them to avoid mistakes and improve work processes.

Conclusions. Physicians had relatively positive attitudes towards the idea of CDSS. They expected flexibility, individuality and reliability of the CDSS. The rather high level of computerized practices and wide use of electronic guidelines probably have paved the way for the CDSS in Finland.

Keywords. Decision support, computerized, focus group, barriers, facilitators.


Varonen H, Kortteisto T and Kaila M. What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Family Practice 2008; 25: 162–167.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.