Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on April 28, 2008
Family Practice 2008 25(3):176-180; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/3/176    most recent
cmn016v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, H
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, H
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Routine glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA) testing: patients' perspective

H Davies, SB Mannan, S Brophy and R Williams

Centre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation (CHIRAL), The School of Medicine, Swansea University, The Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK

Correspondence to H Davies, Centre for Health Information, Research and Evaluation (CHIRAL), The School of Medicine, Swansea University, The Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; Email: h.davies{at}swansea.ac.uk

Received 24 July 2007; Revised 9 March 2008; Accepted 31 March 2008.


   Abstract

Background. Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is a form of type 1 diabetes which in the UK is often diagnosed and treated as type 2 diabetes (T2D). People with LADA show slow progression to insulin dependence and can be distinguished from T2D by blood tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA).

Aims. This study explores the views and experiences of patients who are newly diagnosed with LADA, with particular reference to (i) routine GADA testing; (ii) whether this diagnosis has any influence on the self-management of their diabetes; and (iii) the information needs of patients newly diagnosed with LADA.

Methods. Ten consecutive patients newly diagnosed with LADA (GADA positive) were invited to participate in individual qualitative semi-structured interviews. Their views and experiences were analysed into codes and categories, using a constant comparative method.

Findings. Participants supported routine GADA testing in all patients with diabetes because the provision of a correct diagnosis has an empowering effect on patients, as it encourages the consideration of treatment options early on in the condition. Participants preferred to rely on future Hba1c levels and their doctor's opinion to determine a change in treatment to insulin. Some participants had difficulty distinguishing between the different types of diabetes, including LADA. Others needed to ask questions about LADA in addition to written information.

Conclusions. Participants were supportive of routine GADA testing, would prefer not to start insulin immediately following a diagnosis of LADA and needed to discuss treatment options with health professionals who were knowledgeable on LADA.

Keywords. Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, qualitative, patient views.


Davies H, Mannan SB, Brophy S and Williams R. Routine glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) testing: patients' perspective. Family Practice 2008; 25: 176–180.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.