Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on September 30, 2008
Family Practice 2008 25(Supplement 1):i44-i49; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/suppl_1/i44    most recent
cmn058v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halsted, C. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halsted, C. H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

This article appears in the following Family Practice issue: Creating Supportive Environments for Nutrition Guidance: Towards a Synergy Between Primary Care and Public Health. Proceedings of the Fifth Heelsum International Workshop 10-12 December 2007. [View the issue table of contents]

Perspectives on obesity and sweeteners, folic acid fortification and vitamin D requirements

Charles H Halsted

Department of Internal Medicine, Genome and Biomedical Science Facility, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 65616, USA; Email: chhalsted{at}ucdavis.edu

Received 15 May 2008; Revised 29 July 2008; Accepted 26 August 2008.


   Abstract

This review summarizes three controversial areas of clinical practice that were discussed in many articles that appeared in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition during the author's tenure as editor in chief.

Controversy 1—obesity and high-fructose corn syrup. The increased frequency of obesity in the US is paralleled by increasing annual consumption of high-fructose corn syrup, an extracted sweetener that is routinely added to soft drinks and to many processed foods in the US diet. Metabolic studies implicate increased fructose consumption in increased body fat and obesity and with increased circulating triglyceride levels and hypercholesterolaemia in children.

Controversy 2—folic acid fortification and supplements. Together with widespread use of supplemental multivitamins, fortification of the US diet with folic acid has resulted in high serum folate levels in much of the population, which may be associated with increased risk of cognitive decline in ageing people with low vitamin B12 status, decreased natural killer T-cell immune function and increased risk of recurrent advanced precancerous colorectal adenomas and breast cancer.

Controversy 3—recommended intakes of vitamin D. Levels of serum 25(OH)D sufficient for fracture prevention are at least 75 nmol/l (30 ng/ml) but cannot be achieved by the current recommended dietary intakes in the US. A recent fracture risk prevention trial showed that the 4-year incidence of all cancers was reduced in US women who received high supplemental doses of both calcium and vitamin D.

Keywords. Obesity, folic acid, vitamin D.


Halsted CH. Perspectives on obesity and sweeteners, folic acid fortification and vitamin D requirements. Family Practice 2008; 25: i44–i49.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

HFCS: a controversy that never should have been
John S White
Family Practice, 12 Feb 2009 [Full text]
Response to John White
Charles H Halsted
Family Practice, 12 Feb 2009 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.