Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on January 18, 2009
Family Practice 2009 26(2):145-153; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn105
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/2/145    most recent
cmn105v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calvert, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Freemantle, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calvert, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Freemantle, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Evaluation of the management of heart failure in primary care

Melanie J Calvert, Aparna Shankar, Richard J McManus, Ronan Ryan and Nick Freemantle

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

Correspondence to Melanie J Calvert, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Email: m.calvert{at}bham.ac.uk

Received 30 June 2008; Revised 24 November 2008; Accepted 8 December 2008.


   Abstract

Background. The extent to which guidelines for the treatment of heart failure are currently followed in primary care in the UK is unclear.

Objective. To evaluate the prevalence of heart failure and the pharmacological management of heart failure in relation to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines.

Methods. Retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data from 163 general practices across Great Britain contributing data to the Doctors Independent Network (DIN-LINK) database over a 5-year period until December 31, 2006.

Results. From a patient population of nearly 1.43 million, 9311 patients with heart failure were identified [mean age 78 years (SD 12)], giving an estimated prevalence of 0.7%. Of these, 7410 (79.6%) were prescribed a loop diuretic, 6620 (71.1%) were prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or ARB, 3403 (36.6%) were prescribed β-blockers but only 2732 (29.3%) were prescribed an ACE inhibitor or ARB and a β-blocker in combination. Thirty-five per cent of patients prescribed ACE inhibitor and 11.5% of those prescribed β-blockers met ESC guideline target doses. Age, gender and comorbidity predicted whether patients received β-blocker or ACE inhibitor with younger males being more likely to receive maximal therapy.

Conclusions. These data suggest that while most patients with heart failure receive an ACE inhibitor/ARB in primary care, few are titrated to target dose and many do not receive a β-blocker. Optimum treatment appears to be most likely for young men. New strategies are required to ensure equitable and optimal treatment for all.

Keywords. Heart failure, prevalence, pharmacological management, primary care.


Calvert MJ, Shankar A, McManus RJ, Ryan R and Freemantle N. Evaluation of the management of heart failure in primary care. Family Practice 2009; 26: 145–153.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.