Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHRISTENSEN, B.
Right arrow Articles by MABECK, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHRISTENSEN, B.
Right arrow Articles by MABECK, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 6, No. 1, 19-22
© Oxford University Press 1989

research-article

Differences in Referral Rates from General Practice

BO CHRISTENSEN, HENRIK TOFT SøRENSEN and CARL ERIK MABECK

Institute of General Practice, University of Aarhus Fnuensgade 10, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

Correspondence to Carl Erik Mabeck

There are many unexplained differences in the rates at which general practitioners make referrals to other medical specialists. This study investigated 17 586 referrals from 141 general practitioners to specialists in seven specialties in Ringkjøbing county in Denmark. As an expression of the referral rate, a referral index was estimated for every general practitioner. The referral index was the number of referrals to the specialist per 1000 patients per year, including children, standardized for age and sex to the average population in Ringkjøbing county. The following six variables were evaluated in relation to the referral index: specialists in the local area, doctors per practice, consultations per general practitioner per year, patients registered, consultations per 1000 patients per year standardized for age and sex, and supplementary procedures per consultation. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used. The study showed that the referral index rose both with a better access to specialist and with an increasing number of consultations per practitioner per year. The referral index fell with increased numbers of patients registered. No correlation was found between the referral index and number of supplementary procedures per consultation, number of doctors per practice and number of consultations per 1000 patients per year.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
C. B. Forrest, P. A. Nutting, S. von Schrader, C. Rohde, and B. Starfield
Primary Care Physician Specialty Referral Decision Making: Patient, Physician, and Health Care System Determinants
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 76 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Scand J Public HealthHome page
P. Vedsted, H. T. Sorensen, J. N. Nielsen, and F. Olesen
Variation in proportion of frequent attenders between Danish general practices
Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2004; 32(3): 188 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
C. A O'Donnell
Variation in GP referral rates: what can we learn from the literature?
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2000; 17(6): 462 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.