Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEINGARTEN, M. A
Right arrow Articles by SHANNON, H. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WEINGARTEN, M. A
Right arrow Articles by SHANNON, H. S
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 6, No. 2, 120-124
© Oxford University Press 1989

research-article

Computerized Protocol for Preventive Medicine: A Controlled Self-Audit in Family Practice

MICHAEL A WEINGARTEN*,, DANIEL BAZEL** and HARRY S SHANNON{dagger}

*Kupat Holim Clinic, Rosh Haayin, Israel. Department of Family Medicine, Tel Aviv University
**Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital Jerusalem, Israel
{dagger}Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to Dr M A Weingarten, Department of Family Medicine, Building 130, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel

A protocol for adult health maintenance was designed for display on a desk-top microcomputer in the general practitioner's office. Two hundred and twenty-two patients were entered into a randomized study comparing the outcome of the computerized protocol with manual records. The doctor had the option of displaying the single-screen protocol for the experimental group and acting on its prompts in the course of his normal clinical consultations. At the end of 30 months, significantly more preventive medicine items—smoking, height, blood group, tetanus and rubella immunization status and family planning—had been recorded for patients in the computerized group. For other items, requiring more frequent measurements, computerization produced an advantage only for blood pressure and breast examination, but not for weight, occult blood and serum cholesterol. Recording rates increased significantly for patients in both the control and the computerized groups for all the items. Using the computer lengthened the average consultation time from 8.5 minutes to 10 minutes. Such systems area valuable aid to encouraging doctors to increase the amount of preventive medicine they incorporate into their routine practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.