Family Practice Vol. 9, No. 1, 22-27
© Oxford University Press 1992
research-article |
The General Practitioner and Laboratory Utilization: Why Does It Vary?
* Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø Postuttak, N-9000 Tromsø
** Department of General Practice, University of Oslo Fredrik Stangs gt. 11/13, N-0264 Oslo 2, Norway
In a study of the practice patterns of 128 general practitioners in Northern Norway information concerning 6848 surgery consultations was registered. The ordering of haemoglobin and sedimentation tests was noted as well as urinalyses, forwarding of biological specimens (blood, urine, smears, etc) to other laboratories, and referrals for X-ray examinations. The extent to which doctors ordered these tests varied widely (haemoglobin 0–72% of encounters, urinalyses 0–70%, forwarding of tests 0–56%). Fee-for-service doctors ordered urine microscopy more frequently than did their salaried colleagues, but the ordering of haemoglobin or sedimentation test, and the forwarding of biological samples was about the same. Female and older doctors as well as doctors trained in Norway tended to request tests more often. Laboratory utilization was higher in municipalities with a high turnover of doctors, but the doctors' years of postgraduate experience per se did not affect the extent of test ordering. Tests were requested more often for female patients and with increasing age of the patient. However, only 10% of the variation in laboratory utilization was explained by the variables used in the analyses. This may imply that the medical condition at hand is the strongest determinant of test ordering behaviour.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. J. Poley, K. I. Edelenbos, M. Mosseveld, M. A.M. van Wijk, D. H. de Bakker, J. van der Lei, and M. P.M.H. Rutten-van Molken Cost Consequences of Implementing an Electronic Decision Support System for Ordering Laboratory Tests in Primary Care: Evidence from a Controlled Prospective Study in The Netherlands Clin. Chem., February 1, 2007; 53(2): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. H. J. M. Verstappen, F. van Merode, J. Grimshaw, W. I. Dubois, R. P. T. M. Grol, and T. van Der Weijden Comparing cost effects of two quality strategies to improve test ordering in primary care: a randomized trial Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2004; 16(5): 391 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. H. Verstappen, G. ter Riet, W. I Dubois, R. Winkens, R. P. Grol, and T. van der Weijden Variation in test ordering behaviour of GPs: professional or context-related factors? Fam. Pract., August 1, 2004; 21(4): 387 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. H. J. M. Verstappen, T. van der Weijden, J. Sijbrandij, I. Smeele, J. Hermsen, J. Grimshaw, and R. P. T. M. Grol Effect of a Practice-Based Strategy on Test Ordering Performance of Primary Care Physicians: A Randomized Trial JAMA, May 14, 2003; 289(18): 2407 - 2412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Hutchison, J. Abelson, and J. Lavis Primary Care In Canada: So Much Innovation, So Little Change Health Aff., May 1, 2001; 20(3): 116 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A.M. van Wijk, J. van der Lei, M. Mosseveld, A. M. Bohnen, and J. H. van Bemmel Assessment of Decision Support for Blood Test Ordering in Primary Care: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2001; 134(4): 274 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Gosden, L. Pedersen, and D. Torgerson How should we pay doctors? A systematic review of salary payments and their effect on doctor behaviour QJM, January 1, 1999; 92(1): 47 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|