Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KRISTIANSEN, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by HJORTDAHL, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KRISTIANSEN, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by HJORTDAHL, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 9, No. 1, 22-27
© Oxford University Press 1992


research-article

The General Practitioner and Laboratory Utilization: Why Does It Vary?

IVAR SØNBØ KRISTIANSEN* and PER HJORTDAHL**

* Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø Postuttak, N-9000 Tromsø
** Department of General Practice, University of Oslo Fredrik Stangs gt. 11/13, N-0264 Oslo 2, Norway

In a study of the practice patterns of 128 general practitioners in Northern Norway information concerning 6848 surgery consultations was registered. The ordering of haemoglobin and sedimentation tests was noted as well as urinalyses, forwarding of biological specimens (blood, urine, smears, etc) to other laboratories, and referrals for X-ray examinations. The extent to which doctors ordered these tests varied widely (haemoglobin 0–72% of encounters, urinalyses 0–70%, forwarding of tests 0–56%). Fee-for-service doctors ordered urine microscopy more frequently than did their salaried colleagues, but the ordering of haemoglobin or sedimentation test, and the forwarding of biological samples was about the same. Female and older doctors as well as doctors trained in Norway tended to request tests more often. Laboratory utilization was higher in municipalities with a high turnover of doctors, but the doctors' years of postgraduate experience per se did not affect the extent of test ordering. Tests were requested more often for female patients and with increasing age of the patient. However, only 10% of the variation in laboratory utilization was explained by the variables used in the analyses. This may imply that the medical condition at hand is the strongest determinant of test ordering behaviour.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.