Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAY, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MAY, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 9, No. 1, 76-81
© Oxford University Press 1992

other

Patient Satisfaction and the Detection of Psychiatric Morbidity in General Practice

STEPHANIE MAY

Department of General Practice, United Medical and Dental Schools St. Thomas' Campus, 80 Kennington Road, London SE11 6SP, UK

This study explores the relationship between the detection of psychiatric illness during general practice consultations and patient satisfaction. Psychiatric illness was defined as a score of 3 on the 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). The hypothesis was that patient satisfaction would be higher after consultations during which psychiatric illness was correctly identified by the GP than after those during which it was ‘missed’. Two hundred and twenty two patients attending seven doctors at one inner London practice participated. One hundred and ten patients (50%) scored 3 on the GHQ-12. The GPs classified 76 of these 110 patients as having a psychiatric component to their illness and 34 as having an entirely physical illness. Only one significant difference in satisfaction was found between these two groups-patients in whom psychiatric illness was correctly identified reported more benefit from the consultation than patients in whom psychiatric illness was present but ‘missed’. Possible explanations for the largely negative findings are discussed including the difficulties of measuring patient satisfaction and the distinction between detection and management of psychiatric illness in general practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
E. Comino, D Silove, V Manicavasagar, E Harris, and M. Harris
Agreement in symptoms of anxiety and depression between patients and GPs: the influence of ethnicity
Fam. Pract., January 1, 2001; 18(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.