Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER WAL, G
Right arrow Articles by SPREEUWENBERG, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER WAL, G
Right arrow Articles by SPREEUWENBERG, C
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 9, No. 2, 135-140
© Oxford University Press 1992

research-article

Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. II. Do Dutch Family Doctors Act Prudently?

G VAN DER WAL, JThM VAN EIJK, HJJ LEENEN and C SPREEUWENBERG

Address reprint requests to G. van des Wal, Inspector of Public Health for the Province of North Holland, PO Box 3125, 2001 DC Haarlem, The Netherlands

We conducted a survey among two random samples of Dutch doctors in order to determine whether they acted prudently with regard to euthanasia and assisted suicide. The doctors completed an anonymous questionnaire and those who at one time or another had applied euthanasia or assisted suicide (52%) were asked about several aspects of the requirements for prudent practice.

‘Pointless suffering’ was the most important and most common reason for requesting euthanasia or assisted suicide; ‘pain’ was rarely the most important reason. In 7% of the cases alternative forms of treatment were still available; these were hardly ever therapeutic. A total of 12% of the doctors had applied euthanasia or assisted suicide without having had any kind of consultation or discussion with a colleague, a nurse or any other health care professional; 26% had not issued a certificate testifying to death from natural causes.

We conclude that some of the family doctors do not observe the procedural requirements, but that the majority satisfies the material requirements for prudent practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.