Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHARLTON, I.
Right arrow Articles by CAMPBELL, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHARLTON, I.
Right arrow Articles by CAMPBELL, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 9, No. 2, 154-160
© Oxford University Press 1992


research-article

An Evaluation of a Nurse-run Asthma Clinic in General Practice Using an Attitudes and Morbidity Questionnaire

IAN CHARLTON, GILLIAN CHARLTON, JUDY BROOMFIELD and MICHAEL CAMPBELL

Departments of Primary Medical Care and Statistics University of Southampton, and Prartice Nurse Aylsham, Norfolk UK

Address correspondence to Dr Ian Charlton, 7 Tilba Street, Kincumber, 2251, New South Wales, Australia

A before and after longitudinal study was conducted to evaluate a nurse-run asthma clinic in general practice. Sibbalds1 morbidity and attitudes questionnaire was used to monitor the changes in association with attendance at the clinic. One hundred and five patients aged 3–83 years attended the clinic. Over the 12 months of the study patients reported significant reductions in attacks of wheeze, nocturnal attacks, overall trouble (P 0.005) and GP home visits (P = 0.02). Patients also reported a significant improvement in feelings of stigma (P < 0.001), and confidence in self-care (P < 0.001). There was a significant association between morbidity criteria such as ‘overall interference’ and stigma at the outset of the clinic (R = -0.44; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval -0.58 to -0.26). A patient's feelings of stigma towards their asthma at the outset did not predict the eventual improvement in morbidity. As the patient's asthma improved the feelings of stigma became less apparent. This would suggest that improving a patient's morbidity should be one of the first priorities in asthma care. Confidence in the doctor was high at the outset and did not change throughout the study, despite the fact that a large proportion of patients wanted more information about their asthma but found it difficult to talk to their doctor. General practitioners are often restrained by how much time and resources they can devote to each patient. The nurse-run asthma clinic with its programme of structured care represents a possible solution to these problems.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.