Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HENBEST, R. J
Right arrow Articles by FEHRSEN, G S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HENBEST, R. J
Right arrow Articles by FEHRSEN, G S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 9, No. 3, 311-317
© Oxford University Press 1992


research-article

Patient-centredness: Is It Applicable Outside the West? Its Measurement and Effect on Outcomes

RONALD J HENBEST and G SAM FEHRSEN

Department of Family Medicine, The Medical University of Southern Africa

Address for correspondence: Professor RJ Henbest, Department of Family Medicine, Box 222, PO MEDUNSA 0204, Republic of South Africa

Patient-centredness has been shown to be associated with improved patient outcomes in the West. The objectives of this study were: (i) to further test a specific method for measuring patient-centredness that had previously demonstrated validity and reliability, and (ii) to test the effectiveness of a patient-centred approach amongst poor, non-Western people in South Africa. Patient-centredness was measured in terms of the practitioner's facilitation of the patient's reasons for coming, including symptoms, thoughts, feelings, and expectations. The study involved nurse practitioners and medical doctors in three primary care settings with patients from eight language groups. The method for measuring patient-centredness was found to be valid, reliable (inter-rater correlations, rs=0.95, 0.88, and 0.87), sensitive, and practical, being inexpensive, time efficient, suitable for consultations involving interpreters, and not requiring transcripts. The score for the first 2 minutes of the consultation correlated highly with the score for the entire consultation (rs=0.92), which could make the method useful on a large scale. Patient-centredness itself, was also time effective, applicable to cross-cultural consultations involving interpreters, and was associated with patients feeling understood (P=0.03), patient-practitioner agreement (P=0.049), symptom resolution (P=0.01), and concern resolution (P=0.006). This study supports the effectiveness of patient-centred interviewing in a non-Western setting as well as this method of assessing it.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.