Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ESKERUD, J. R
Right arrow Articles by LUNDE, P. K. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ESKERUD, J. R
Right arrow Articles by LUNDE, P. K. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 9, No. 4, 425-432
© Oxford University Press 1992


other

Fever in General Practice II. Reasons for Encounter, Management and Duration of Fever Conditions

JENS R ESKERUD*,{dagger}, EVEN LAERUM*, HANS FAGERTHUN** and PER KNUT M LUNDE***

* University of Oslo, Department of General Practice Frederik Stangsgt, 11/13 N-0264 Oslo
** Medstat Research PO Box 37, N-2011 Strømmen
*** University of Oslo, Department of Pharmacotherapeutics PO Box 1065 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway

{dagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed at the University of Oslo, Department of Pharmacotherapeutics, PO Box 1065 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway

A sample of 80 direct and 36 telephone encounters for fever was established in 1988 as part of a Norwegian study on fever as a clinical problem in general practice. Reasons for encounter (ICPC) and clinical examinations were recorded along with clinical laboratory tests, treatment, management and follow up (IC-Process-PC). The doctors assessed the diagnostic process by means of visual analogue scale. Duration of the fever conditions was estimated through a postal questionnaire. Patients with direct encounters presented a wide range of reasons for the encounters. Fever was the most frequent single presenting complaint (31%). The general practitioners put major emphasis on the clinical examinations. They prescribed drugs in 68% of the direct encounters. Seventy per cent of the prescriptions were general systemic anti-infectives. Penicillin accounted for 58% of antibiotics. Six (8%) patients were hospitalized, and three (4%) were referred to a specialist. The mean time until complete recovery was 15 days for direct and 19 days for telephone encounters. Fever may be a sign even when it is not a presenting complaint. Major emphasis is probably put on the clinical examination of febrile patients because of the complexity of symptoms and the wide range of diagnoses associated with fever.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.