Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on February 2, 2008

Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm074
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/1/27    most recent
cmm074v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacBride-Stewart, S. P
Right arrow Articles by Walley, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacBride-Stewart, S. P
Right arrow Articles by Walley, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Do quality incentives change prescribing patterns in primary care? An observational study in Scotland

Sean P MacBride-Stewarta, Rob Eltonb and Tom Walleyc

a North East Edinburgh Local Health Partnership, National Health Service Lothian, Edinburgh
b Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
c Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK

Correspondence to Sean P MacBride-Stewart, North East Edinburgh Local Healthcare Partnership, National Health Service Lothian, 12 Junction Place, Edinburgh EH21 5JA, UK; Email: sean.macbride-stewart{at}lpct.scot.nhs.uk

Received 9 February 2007; Revised 12 October 2007; Accepted 7 November 2007.


   Abstract

Background. The 2004 General Medical Services (GMS) contract introduced financial incentives for the management of chronic illnesses in 10 clinical areas. The effect of the scheme on prescribing is unknown.

Objectives. To quantify the impact of the latest GMS contract, which incorporates additional payments for quality outcomes, on prescribing patterns in GP practices.

Methods. This retrospective observational study of prescribing compared the defined daily doses (DDDs) for drugs mentioned or implied within the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) of the latest GMS contract (QOF drugs) to the DDDs for all other drugs listed within the first 10 chapters on the British National Formulary (non-QOF drugs) for four financial years; two before and two after the introduction of the latest GMS contract. These measures were calculated for 92 GP practices of 100 in the Lothian region of Scotland, and the rate of change of prescribing was calculated from regression slopes within the log-scale interrupted time series analyses.

Results. The prescribing of QOF drugs increased significantly faster than the non-QOF drugs both before and after the introduction of the latest GMS contract but the rate of increase for the QOF drugs slowed significantly after April 2005 unlike prescribing of non-QOF drugs.

Conclusions. The prescribing of relevant drugs increased before the introduction of the 2004 GMS contract; the increase continued in the first 2 years of the new contract but at a significantly lower level.

Keywords. Defined daily dose, drug utilization, General Medical Services, prescribing, Quality and Outcomes Framework.


MacBride-Stewart SP, Elton R and Walley T. Do quality incentives change prescribing patterns in primary care? An observational study in Scotland. Family Practice 2007; Pages 1–6 of 6.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.