Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on September 19, 2008

Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn061
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/suppl_1/i87    most recent
cmn061v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Dillen, S M E
Right arrow Articles by Hiddink, G J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Dillen, S M E
Right arrow Articles by Hiddink, G J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

A comparison of Dutch family doctors' and patients' perspectives on nutrition communication

S M E van Dillen and G J Hiddink

Department of Communication Management, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to S M E van Dillen, Centre for Indications in Health Care (CIZ), PO Box 232, 3970 AE Driebergen, The Netherlands; Email: sonja.van.dillen{at}ciz.nl

Received 21 May 2008; Accepted 26 August 2008.


   Abstract

Background. In recent years, we have investigated both patients’ and family doctors’ communicative characteristics towards nutrition communication in general practice with several qualitative and quantitative studies. A sound comparison of the survey results between both conversation partners has not been made before.

Objective. The aim of the present study was to put together data obtained by earlier studies for the first time in order to make comparisons of patients’ and family doctors’ communicative characteristics regarding nutrition communication.

Methods. In The Netherlands, 603 patients completed a face-to-face interview-assisted questionnaire (65% response rate) and 267 family doctors completed a questionnaire (45% response rate).

Results. When comparing communicative characteristics, patients stronger believed that nutrition was an influence on health than family doctors. They also attributed a greater role to personal hygiene, stress and heredity, while family doctors were more convinced of the role of alcohol use and smoking on health. Patients more often rated their own nutrition knowledge as good than family doctors. In contrast, family doctors showed higher interest in nutrition and nutrition information than patients. As a result, a collinear model for family doctors and nutrition communication towards patients was provided.

Conclusions. Significant differences between patients and family doctors were found for several communicative characteristics towards nutrition communication. It is important that family doctors become convinced that patients perceive them as a reliable and expert source of nutrition information. It is recommended that family doctors raise nutrition awareness among patients. Finally, we advise family doctors to pay attention to nutrition communication styles.

Keywords. Communication, family doctors, interaction, nutrition, patients.


van Dillen SME and Hiddink GJ. A comparison of Dutch family doctors' and patients' perspectives on nutrition communication. Family Practice 2008; Pages 1–6 of 6.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.