Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 6, 575-576
© Oxford University Press 2002

Editorial

The impact of Family Practice

Roger Jones

Guy’s, King’s & St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, UK; E-mail: roger.jones@kcl.ac.uk

Jones R. The impact of Family Practice. Family Practice 2002; 19: 575–576.

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Someone once remarked that only three things matter if a restaurant is to be successful—position, position and position. The same could be said about journals, where the most important criteria are citation, citation and citation. It was a particular pleasure, therefore, to learn that the steadily rising Impact Factor of Family Practice now stands at 1.16, which is higher than journals such as the American Family Physician (0.94), the Canadian Family Physician (0.35), the Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London (0.83), the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (0.72), the Postgraduate Medical Journal (0.44), Primary . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?