Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on April 4, 2006
Family Practice 2006 23(4):469-471; doi:10.1093/fampra/cml013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Views of family physicians in southwestern Ontario on preventive care services and performance incentives
a Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Hamilton
b Medicine, McMaster University Hamilton
c Family Medicine, McMaster University Hamilton
d School of Nursing, Ryerson University Toronto, ON, Canada
Correspondence to Janusz Kaczorowski, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 75 Frid Street, Hamilton, ON L8P 4M3, Canada; Email: kaczorow@mcmaster.ca
Received 20 October 2005; Accepted 8 March 2006.
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
| Introduction |
|---|
Although the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommends that several preventive care services be routinely provided to eligible patients in primary care settings,1 the delivery rate for these services continues to be suboptimal.2 A recent meta-analysis found evidence to support the use of several strategies to improve preventive care delivery rates,3 yet many practitioners still rely primarily on an opportunistic approach for delivering preventive care services.
Primary care networks (PCN) and family health networks (FHN) are two new models of primary health care delivery in Ontario, characterized by patient rostering and a capitation payment structure with added incentives. One such
| Methods |
|---|
| Results |
|---|
| Conclusion |
|---|
| Appendix |
|---|