Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Sutter, A. I
Right arrow Articles by Peersman, W. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Sutter, A. I
Right arrow Articles by Peersman, W. P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 2, 209-213
© Oxford University Press 2001

Antibiotic prescribing in acute infections of the nose or sinuses: a matter of personal habit?

An I De Sutter, Marc J De Meyere, Jan M De Maeseneer and Wim P Peersman,a

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, and
a Department of Population Studies and Social Science Research Methods, University of Gent, De Pintelaan, 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.

De Sutter AI, De Meyere MJ, De Maeseneer JM and Peersman WP. Antibiotic prescribing in acute infections of the nose or sinuses: a matter of personal habit? Family Practice 2001; 8: 209–213.

Received 22 February 2000; Revised 12 August 2000; Accepted 30 October 2000.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. A proper understanding of how and why GPs prescribe antibiotics in general practice is essential for the design of strategies aimed at making prescribing more rational.

Objective. The intention of this study is to contribute to such understanding by investigating which elements are important in the GP's decision to prescribe antibiotics for patients with acute infectious complaints of the nose and/or sinuses.

Methods. During their training in general practice, students observed the following elements while attending encounters between their trainer-GP and patients with a runny nose, blocked nose or cough: patient characteristics, contact characteristics, signs and symptoms, diagnosis and prescriptions. Information on practice characteristics and characteristics of the trainer-GP were collected. Data were analysed using multiple logistic regression and multiple linear regression.

Results. A total of 722 cases were analysed with the following results: the best independent predictor of an antibiotic prescription is the individual antibiotic prescribing rate (IAPR), which expresses the personal habit of the GP in prescribing antibiotics [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.22–8.62]. Others are the diagnostic labels ‘sinusitis’ (adjusted OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.2–6.49) and ‘flu-like syndrome’ (adjusted OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.45), and the sign ‘sinus tenderness’ (adjusted OR 4.37, CI 2.15–8.89). The antibiotic prescribing behaviour intensifies with an increasing tendency to prescribe medication in general (ß = 0.46, P < 0.00) and with an increasing defensive attitude (ß = 0.22, P < 0.05).

Conclusions. Whether or not a patient with an acute infection of the nose and/or sinuses will be handed an antibiotic prescription seems to depend more on the attending doctor's prescribing behaviour than on the clinical picture. Further qualitative research into attitudes which may be related to a high tendency to prescribe antibiotics consequently is of the utmost importance.

Keywords. Antibiotic prescribing, family practice, physician's practice patterns, prescribing behaviour, upper respiratory tract infections.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In general practice, acute upper respiratory tract infections are one of the main reasons for prescribing antibiotics. However, evidence is mounting that in non-immune-compromised patients, watchful waiting for the disease to run its natural course is probably the best approach:1 clinical trials show that benefit from antibiotics is minimal, while other opposing arguments include adverse side effects, development of bacterial resistance and the financial cost to the patient and society.

Strategies to change prescribing behaviour will only be successful when they are based on a proper understanding of how and why GPs prescribe antibiotics.

In this study, our aim was to contribute to this understanding by exploring to what extent various factors—such as the diagnostic label, the patient's signs or symptoms and contextual factors—are important in the GP's decision to prescribe antibiotics for patients with acute infectious complaints of the nose or sinuses.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In 1996, during three periods of 1–4 days, students of the medical school of Gent (Belgium) undergoing elective vocational training in general practice observed the encounters of their trainer-GP with patients having one of the following symptoms: runny nose, blocked nose and/or cough. They registered patient characteristics, signs and symptoms, diagnostic label and treatment (Tables 1 and 2GoGo). Data on the observed GPs were also collected (Table 1Go). The ‘defensive attitude score’ expresses the GP's ‘risk-avoiding attitude’ and was measured using a validated questionnaire: the higher the score, the more the GP will always prefer the certain to the uncertain.2 The individual antibiotic prescribing rate (IAPR) measures the tendency to prescribe antibiotics and was calculated by dividing the number of encounters with an antibiotic prescription by the total number of encounters registered with this GP. The tendency to prescribe in general is the mean number of medications prescribed per registered contact.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Relationships between antibiotic prescribing and patient, encounter and doctor characteristics
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Variables associated with prescribing an antibiotic to a patient with acute infectious complaints of the nose and/or sinuses: biavariate and multivariate analysisa
 
Analysis
Data were entered in SPSS 7.5 for Windows. Statistics used were odds ratios (ORs), Pearson's correlation coefficients, Student's t-test, multiple linear regression and multiple logistic regression.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Eighty GPs participated. Four were women, 72 had more than 10 years' experience in practice and 47 worked in a single-handed practice. A total of 722 out of 1052 registered encounters were analysed; all patients with a normal clinical pulmonary examination and at least one symptom related to the nose or sinuses were included. The patient's mean age was 32 years, and 55% were women (Table1Go).

The best independent predictor of an antibiotic prescription was the IAPR of the prescribing GP. Others were the diagnostic labels ‘sinusitis’ and ‘flu-like syndrome’, and the sign ‘sinus tenderness’ (Table 2Go). The IAPR of the GPs varied extensively from 0 to 100%: some prescribed no antibiotics at all; others prescribed them in every encounter (Table 1Go). The mix of diagnoses allocated by doctors with a high IAPR was not significantly different from that of those with a low IAPR (data not in table). The IAPR intensifies with an increasing tendency to prescribe medication in general and with an increasing defensive attitude (Table 1Go).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our main finding is that patients with complaints of the nose or sinuses are prescribed antibiotics primarily because they consult a GP who usually prescribes antibiotics for this disease, and not so much because they are suffering from certain signs or symptoms or because a particular diagnosis has been made. The results show that GPs have very divergent antibiotic prescribing behaviours and that precisely this personal tendency is the best predictor—better than diagnosis or signs and symptoms —of whether or not a patient will be prescribed an antibiotic. Several studies3,69 have already drawn attention to the importance of contextual factors in prescribing but, to our knowledge, this is the first time that it has been shown, in quantitative terms, that non-biomedical factors can be even more important than clinical facts in antibiotic prescribing.

Also significant, but to a lesser extent, are the ‘flu-like syndrome’ label associated with fewer antibiotic prescriptions and the ‘sinusitis’ label associated with more, which confirms previous research.3 However, frequencies of various diagnostic labels are not significantly different between low and high prescribers, which rather contradicts Howie's statement that diagnoses are chosen as a justification for treatment.4 Finally, ‘tenderness of the sinuses’, an important sign for GPs when making the diagnosis ‘sinusitis’,5 is apparently an indication of sinus involvement and thus a reason to prescribe more antibiotics in other diagnoses too.

With regard to the method, using students as observers made it possible to collect data on real patient encounters, thus avoiding possible bias by self-reporting or reporting on simulated case histories. Nonetheless, all participating GPs inevitably were trainers associated with the university and, moreover, well aware of being observed. However, this probably made their antibiotic prescribing more uniform and ‘by the book’ and actually makes the variations in IAPR even more remarkable. The students, moreover, recorded only facts. The influence of other factors known to be important, such as patients' expectations,6 the doctor–patient relationship7,8 and psychosocial background features9 were not investigated. It is unlikely, however, that these factors would increase the importance of clinical facts in prescribing antibiotics.

In our data, we found two indications why some GPs prescribe more antibiotics than others. First, high prescribers are GPs who prescribe a lot of medication in general. They prescribe antibiotics in addition to symptomatic therapy and not as a substitute for it. Secondly, high prescribers have a ‘defensive attitude’, which means that they are unwilling to take risks and have problems in coping with uncertainty. Both of these findings are in line with previous research.2,3,10 Interestingly, research also shows that defensiveness is not merely a personal characteristic of GPs but can be determined in part by the structure of the health care system the GP works in, which illustrates the complexity of prescribing behaviour.2

In conclusion, our results show that to design effective strategies aimed at rationalizing antibiotic prescribing, further research into individual prescribing habits and their determinants could well be more important than collecting rational arguments based on clinical evidence.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 van Weel C, van Grunsven P. Resistance to prescribing and to antibiotics. Lancet 1999; 354: 1052.[Web of Science][Medline]

2 Grol R, Whitfield M, De Maeseneer J, Mokkink H. Attitudes to risk taking in medical decision making among British, Dutch and Belgian general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1990; 40: 134–136.[Web of Science][Medline]

3 De Maeseneer J. Het voorschrijven van antibiotica bij luchtwegproblemen. Een explorerend onderzoek. Huisarts Wet 1990; 33: 223–226.

4 Howie JGR. Diagnosis—the Achilles heel? J R Coll Gen Pract 1972; 22: 310–315.[Medline]

5 Little DR, Mann BL, Sherk DW. Factors influencing the clinical diagnosis of sinusitis. J Fam Pract 1998; 46: 147–152.[Web of Science][Medline]

6 Britten N, Ukoumunne O. The influence of patients' hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors' perceptions and the decision to prescribe: a questionnaire survey. Br Med J 1997; 315: 1506–1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Butler CC, Rollnick S, Pill R, Maggs-Rapport R, Stott N. Understanding the culture of prescribing: qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats. Br Med J 1998; 317: 637–642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 Bradley C. Uncomfortable prescribing decisions: a critical incident study. Br Med J 1992; 310: 97–100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Howie JGR. Clinical judgement and antibiotic use in general practice. Br Med J 1976; 2: 1061–1064.

10 Sorensen HT, Steffensen FH, Schonheyder HC, Gron P, Sabroe S. Use of microbiological diagnostics and antibiotics in Danish general practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1996; 16: 50–53.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. Lindbaek
Acute Sinusitis To Treat or Not to Treat?
JAMA, December 5, 2007; 298(21): 2543 - 2544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M L van Driel, S Coenen, K Dirven, J Lobbestael, I Janssens, P Van Royen, F M Haaijer-Ruskamp, M De Meyere, J De Maeseneer, and T Christiaens
What is the role of quality circles in strategies to optimise antibiotic prescribing? A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 197 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H. Varonen, U.-M. Rautakorpi, S. Nyberg, P. O Honkanen, T. Klaukka, E. Palva, R. Roine, H. Sarkkinen, M. Makela, P. Huovinen, et al.
Implementing guidelines on acute maxillary sinusitis in general practice--a randomized controlled trial
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 201 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
M. L. van Driel, A. De Sutter, M. Deveugele, W. Peersman, C. C. Butler, M. De Meyere, J. De Maeseneer, and T. Christiaens
Are Sore Throat Patients Who Hope for Antibiotics Actually Asking for Pain Relief?
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 494 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. E. Akkerman, M. M. Kuyvenhoven, J. C. van der Wouden, and T. J. M. Verheij
Determinants of antibiotic overprescribing in respiratory tract infections in general practice
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2005; 56(5): 930 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
N. Huang, Y.-J. Chou, H.-J. Chang, M. Ho, and L. Morlock
Antibiotic prescribing by ambulatory care physicians for adults with nasopharyngitis, URIs, and acute bronchitis in Taiwan: a multi-level modeling approach
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2005; 22(2): 160 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
I. Welschen, M. Kuyvenhoven, A. Hoes, and T. Verheij
Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract symptoms: patients' expectations, GPs' management and patient satisfaction
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2004; 21(3): 234 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
J. M. De Maeseneer and A. De Sutter
Why Research in Family Medicine? A Superfluous Question
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(suppl_2): S17 - S22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Med Inform AssocHome page
V. Sintchenko, E. Coiera, J. R Iredell, and G. L Gilbert
Comparative Impact of Guidelines, Clinical Data, and Decision Support on Prescribing Decisions: An Interactive Web Experiment with Simulated Cases
JAMIA, January 1, 2004; 11(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
V. Sintchenko, E. Coiera, J. R. Iredell, and G. L. Gilbert
Comparative Impact of Guidelines, Clinical Data, and Decision Support on Prescribing Decisions: An Interactive Web Experiment with Simulated Cases
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2004; 11(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J Szecsenyi
Influence of attitudes and behaviour of GPs on prescribing costs
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2003; 12(1): 6 - 7.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Sutter, A. I
Right arrow Articles by Peersman, W. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Sutter, A. I
Right arrow Articles by Peersman, W. P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?