Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 5, 516-518
© Oxford University Press 2001
The consultation |
GPs' views on their management of sexual dysfunction
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University College London, UK.
Irwin Nazareth, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University College London, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Humphery S and Nazareth I. GPs' views on their management of sexual dysfunction. Family Practice 2001; 18: 516–518.
Received 13 September 2000; Revised 20 February 2001; Accepted 4 May 2001.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background. Sexual dysfunction is an important aspect of sexual heath that is prevalent in the population but frequently goes undetected.
Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the GP in the management of problems of sexual dysfuntion.
Methods. A postal questionnaire was sent to the 218 GPs on the Camden and Islington Health Authority List. The questionnaire collected demographic information on the GPs, their clinical interests, experience, postgraduate qualifications and their view of the clinical importance of sexual dysfunction. Their clinical management of the most recent patient encounter in the previous month was explored using a critical incident technique and they were asked to list their views on barriers to the management of sexual dysfunction and to provide a list of suggestions for tackling these barriers.
Results. A total of 133 GPs responded to the questionnaire. Although only eight had a special interest in sexual health, 41 and 50 reported a special interest in mental and women's health, respectively. Forty-six had received postgraduate training in taking a sexual history, 45 in the diagnosis of a sexual problem, 49 in the management of sexual dysfunction, 39 in psychosexual counselling and 24 had training in all four areas. Most GPs (87) categorized sexual dysfunction as medium priority, 25 as high priority and 18 as low priority; three GPs did not respond to this query. Several barriers to the management of sexual dysfunction in general practice were identified. Most doctors identified more than one barrier.
Conclusions. The participating GPs offered specific suggestions that focused on the need for more professional and patient education, consultation time, psychosexual counsellors and relevant secondary care service.
Keywords. GPs, management, sexual dysfunction.
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Sexual dysfunction is an important aspect of sexual heath that is prevalent (43% of women and 31% men)1 in the population but frequently goes undetected.2 Most patients think it appropriate to discuss their sexual problems with their GP.2,3 Little, however, is known, about the role of the GP in their management.
|
Method |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
A postal questionnaire with a covering letter and a stamped addressed return envelope was sent to the 218 GPs on the Camden and Islington Health Authority List, in June 1999. The questionnaire collected demographic information on the GPs, their clinical interests, experience, postgraduate qualifications and their view of the clinical importance of sexual dysfunction (using a Likert scale). Their clinical management of the most recent patient encounter in the previous month was explored using a critical incident technique. Lastly, using two-open ended questions, we asked them to list their views on barriers to the management of sexual dysfunction and also to provide a list of suggestions for tackling these barriers.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
After two reminders, 133 (61%) GPs responded, 78 (59%) of whom were male. Their average age was 44 years (SD 9.6), 101 (76%) were full-time, 120 (90%) were principals, and the average time in their current post was 11 years (SD 8.3). One hundred and fifteen (86%) had at least one postgraduate qualification. Although only eight (6%) had a special interest in sexual health, 41 (30%) and 50 (47%) reported a special interest in mental and women's health, respectively. Forty-six (33%) had received postgraduate training in taking a sexual history, 45 (33%) in the diagnosis of a sexual problem, 49 (36%) in the management of sexual dysfunction, 39 (29%) in psychosexual counselling and 24 (17%) had training in all four areas. On a scale of 1–5 (1 = very low priority and 5 = very high priority), most GPs, 87 (65.4%) categorized sexual dysfunction as medium priority, 25 (18.8%) as high priority and 18 (13.6%) as low priority; three (2.2%) did not respond to this query.
Data from critical incidents suggest that the GP encounters on average 2.6 patients/month (SD 1.8). Eighty-five (62%) of these recent consultations were for erectile dysfunction. One hundred and twelve (84%) GPs followed up the patients themselves, while 33 (25%) referred them to secondary care, in particular Urology out-patients 12 (9%). Lastly, 45 (34%) prescribed Sildenafil to the most recent patient seen the preceding month.
Several barriers to the management of sexual dysfunction in general practice were identified. Most doctors identified more than one barrier. These are listed in Table 1
. We independently analysed all items listed by the doctors to develop principal themes. Further analysis of these themes identified four main categories. These were the doctor, the patient, the doctor–patient interaction and the contextual barriers. Data on suggestions around tackling barriers were also analysed (Table 1).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This is the first study in the UK that assesses the management of sexual dysfunction in general practice from the GPs' perspective. Our GPs were representative of those in Camden and Islington, a health authority thatis representative of other London health authorities.4 The average age of the GPs in Camden and Islington at the time of the study was 48 years, and 56% of the doctors were male (based on data obtained from the Health Authority). Patients with sexual dysfunction were encountered commonly in general practice, and at least a third of GPs had some training in this area. External barriers around contextual/structural issues were mentioned most commonly, particularly the lack of time and limited availability of secondary care referral services (especially psychosexual services). Other important barriers centred on poor knowledge, training and skills together with the patients' reluctance to discuss these issues in general practice. The suggestion for possible solutions focused mainly on increased education of doctors and patients on sexual problems, more general practice consultation time to deal with these issues and a need for more specialists in this field.
The study was limited by the use of a questionnaire for data collection. Although we used open questions, some of the ideas listed by the GPs could not be explored as would have been possible using in-depth interviews. For example, when the GPs mentioned inadequate knowledge or lack of training in the area of psychosexual medicine, they did not offer more details. Specific aspects, however, have been listed by some GPs. These include lack of experience in taking a sexual history; not asking about the issue; GPs attitude and embarassment; and lack of sensitivity (Table 1
).
Medical treatments of sexual dysfunction will result in increasing numbers of patients seeking help from their GP.5 Both doctors and patients, however, remain poorly informed about these issues and specialist care cannot be accessed easily. The participating GPs, however, offered specific suggestions that focused on the need for more professional and patient education, consultation time, psychosexual counsellors and relevant secondary care service (Table 1).
The future of management of sexual dysfunction in general practice was described most clearly in some of the comments made by the participating doctors. These are
"It is an important topic that needs more research and investigation. I feel there is a lot of misery waiting to be discovered and treated."
But
"This is not a priority area, not a healthier nation target and there is no reimbursement for extra work."
But yet
"At the time when one is with a distressed patient, the priority seems high for the individual."
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
SH conducted this study as a part-time GP research fellow at the Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences and was funded by the Camden and Islington Health Authority. We are grateful to Professor Michael King for his comments on the questionnaire and the final paper.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1 Read S, King M, Watson J. Sexual dysfunction in primary medical care: prevalence, characteristics and detection by the general practitioner. J Publ Health Med 1997; 19: 387–391.
2
Laumann E, Paik A, Rosen R. Sexual dysfunction in the United States—prevalence and predictors. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 281: 537–544.
3 Spence SJA. Problems that patients feel are appropriate to discuss with their GPs. J Soc Med 1992; 85: 669–673.
4 Nazareth I. The care of schizophrenia in general practice. University of London, PhD Thesis 1997.
5 Heaton JP, Adams MA, Morales A. A therapeutic taxonomy of treatments for erectile dysfunction: an evolutionary imperative. Int J Impotence Res 1997; 9: 115–121.[Web of Science][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C Emerson, D Goldmeier, P Green, and on behalf of BASHH Special Interest Group for Sexu Assessing training in sexual dysfunction for genitourinary medicine registrars Int J STD AIDS, November 1, 2009; 20(11): 745 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P Green, D Goldmeier, and for and on behalf of BASHH Special Interest Group Sexual dysfunction service provision in UK genitourinary medicine clinics in 2007 Int J STD AIDS, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 30 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Coulson and T. Crowley Current thoughts on psychosexual disorders in women Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), October 1, 2007; 9(4): 217 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Wylie Sexuality: its not just sex J R Soc Med, July 1, 2007; 100(7): 300 - 300. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. D. Butterfield, W. A. Borgen, N. E. Amundson, and A.-S. T. Maglio Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond Qualitative Research, November 1, 2005; 5(4): 475 - 497. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Gott, E. Galena, S. Hinchliff, and H. Elford "Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care Fam. Pract., October 1, 2004; 21(5): 528 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Nazareth, P. Boynton, and M. King Problems with sexual function in people attending London general practitioners: cross sectional study BMJ, August 23, 2003; 327(7412): 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||